1964Acta Oto-LaryngologicaRequires access

A Comparison of Carbocaine-Thesat® and Lidocaine as Surface Anaesthetics for the Lower Respiratory Tract

L Telivuo

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this study, 189 patients were anaesthetized with local anaesthetics for bronchographic x-ray examination. Carbocaine-Thesat (4 + 1)% and lido-caine (4%) were compared in a double blind test. The anaesthetic solutions were used both with and without epinephrine. There was no difference between Carbocaine-Thesat and lidocaine in the onset of anaesthesia. When the group without epinephrine in the anaesthetic solution was compared with the epinephrine group the difference was significant (p<0.01). If epinephrine is added the onset of anaesthesia is slower on the tracheal mucosa. The durations of anaesthesia without epinephrine in the local anaesthetic solutions were compared. The mean for Carbocaine-Thesat was 61 minutes and for lidocaine 102 minutes. The results seem to suggest that it is not advisable to add vasoconstrictors to local anaesthetic solutions for surface anaesthesia of the lower respiratory tract.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this study, 189 patients were anaesthetized with local anaesthetics for bronchographic x-ray examination. Carbocaine-Thesat (4 + 1)% and lido-caine (4%) were compared in a double blind test. The anaesthetic solutions were used both with and without epinephrine. There was no difference between Carbocaine-Thesat and lidocaine in the onset of anaesthesia. When the group without epinephrine in the anaesthetic solution was compared with the epinephrine group the difference was significant (p<0.01). If epinephrine is added the onset of anaesthesia is slower on the tracheal mucosa. The durations of anaesthesia without epinephrine in the local anaesthetic solutions were compared. The mean for Carbocaine-Thesat was 61 minutes and for lidocaine 102 minutes. The results seem to suggest that it is not advisable to add vasoconstrictors to local anaesthetic solutions for surface anaesthesia of the lower respiratory tract.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this study, 189 patients were anaesthetized with local anaesthetics for bronchographic x-ray examination. Carbocaine-Thesat (4 + 1)% and lido-caine (4%) were compared in a double blind test. The anaesthetic solutions were used both with and without epinephrine. There was no difference between Carbocaine-Thesat and lidocaine in the onset of anaesthesia. When the group without epinephrine in the anaesthetic solution was compared with the epinephrine group the difference was significant (p<0.01). If epinephrine is added the onset of anaesthesia is slower on the tracheal mucosa. The durations of anaesthesia without epinephrine in the local anaesthetic solutions were compared. The mean for Carbocaine-Thesat was 61 minutes and for lidocaine 102 minutes. The results seem to suggest that it is not advisable to add vasoconstrictors to local anaesthetic solutions for surface anaesthesia of the lower respiratory tract.

Key concepts: Lidocaine, Epinephrine, Anesthesia, Local anaesthetic, Medicine, Respiratory tract, Significant difference, Respiratory system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Carbocaine-Thesat® and Lidocaine as Surface Anaesthetics for the Lower Respiratory Tract — Research Paper | ScholarLens