1983North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementRequires access

The Licensing of Marine Recreational Fishermen

William Malon Scogin

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This study provides an account of certain current marine recreational fishery issues including licensing in the coastal states in 1981. Only four states license their resident marine recreational fishermen on a continuing basis. These general licenses apply to all waters of the state and marine anglers cannot be separated from the general fishing population. This latter factor is important to using license files for data collection. Interviews with state officials disclosed that marine recreational fishery programs suffer from a lack of funding and data collection. Most of the officials acknowledge the advantages of implementing a saltwater fishing license. Alternatives to a saltwater fishing license mentioned by them included financing from state general funds as a source of revenue, and surveys, censuses, and voluntary reporting for data collection. However, most felt that other alternatives were not as equitable or beneficial as a separate saltwater fishing license. State officials also predicted that the tourist industry in their respective states would be opposed to a separate saltwater fishing license, fearing a loss in tourist business. However, the majority of the officials were inclined to believe that fishermen would support a saltwater fishing license as long as definite plans for marine recreational fisheries programs were established. Should coastal states adopt a separate saltwater license for marine anglers, it is recommended that they base their programs upon certain principles for levying user charges.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study provides an account of certain current marine recreational fishery issues including licensing in the coastal states in 1981. Only four states license their resident marine recreational fishermen on a continuing basis. These general licenses apply to all waters of the state and marine anglers cannot be separated from the general fishing population. This latter factor is important to using license files for data collection. Interviews with state officials disclosed that marine recreational fishery programs suffer from a lack of funding and data collection. Most of the officials acknowledge the advantages of implementing a saltwater fishing license. Alternatives to a saltwater fishing license mentioned by them included financing from state general funds as a source of revenue, and surveys, censuses, and voluntary reporting for data collection. However, most felt that other alternatives were not as equitable or beneficial as a separate saltwater fishing license. State officials also predicted that the tourist industry in their respective states would be opposed to a separate saltwater fishing license, fearing a loss in tourist business. However, the majority of the officials were inclined to believe that fishermen would support a saltwater fishing license as long as definite plans for marine recreational fisheries programs were established. Should coastal states adopt a separate saltwater license for marine anglers, it is recommended that they base their programs upon certain principles for levying user charges.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study provides an account of certain current marine recreational fishery issues including licensing in the coastal states in 1981. Only four states license their resident marine recreational fishermen on a continuing basis. These general licenses apply to all waters of the state and marine anglers cannot be separated from the general fishing population. This latter factor is important to using license files for data collection. Interviews with state officials disclosed that marine recreational fishery programs suffer from a lack of funding and data collection. Most of the officials acknowledge the advantages of implementing a saltwater fishing license. Alternatives to a saltwater fishing license mentioned by them included financing from state general funds as a source of revenue, and surveys, censuses, and voluntary reporting for data collection. However, most felt that other alternatives were not as equitable or beneficial as a separate saltwater fishing license. State officials also predicted that the tourist industry in their respective states would be opposed to a separate saltwater fishing license, fearing a loss in tourist business. However, the majority of the officials were inclined to believe that fishermen would support a saltwater fishing license as long as definite plans for marine recreational fisheries programs were established. Should coastal states adopt a separate saltwater license for marine anglers, it is recommended that they base their programs upon certain principles for levying user charges.

Key concepts: License, Recreation, Fishing, Fishery, Revenue, Business, Commercial fishing, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Licensing of Marine Recreational Fishermen — Research Paper | ScholarLens