2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Integrated Corridor Management in the U.S. — Analysis, modeling and simulation

Vassili Alexiadis

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This paper documents the analysis methodologies, tools, and performance measures used to analyze Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) strategies; and presents high-level results for the successful implementation of ICM at three Stage 2 Pioneer Sites, including 1) the U.S. 75 corridor in Dallas, Texas; 2) the I-15 corridor in San Diego, California; and 3) the I-394 corridor in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The following sections provide an overall summary of benefits, followed by brief descriptions of the corridors, operational conditions and ICM strategies analyzed, and summaries of estimated benefits for each corridor. Following these sections is a summary of the analysis methodology employed in the three sites, including model calibration methodology, analysis for different operational conditions, performance measures, analysis plans, and calculation of ICM benefits.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper documents the analysis methodologies, tools, and performance measures used to analyze Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) strategies; and presents high-level results for the successful implementation of ICM at three Stage 2 Pioneer Sites, including 1) the U.S. 75 corridor in Dallas, Texas; 2) the I-15 corridor in San Diego, California; and 3) the I-394 corridor in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The following sections provide an overall summary of benefits, followed by brief descriptions of the corridors, operational conditions and ICM strategies analyzed, and summaries of estimated benefits for each corridor. Following these sections is a summary of the analysis methodology employed in the three sites, including model calibration methodology, analysis for different operational conditions, performance measures, analysis plans, and calculation of ICM benefits.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper documents the analysis methodologies, tools, and performance measures used to analyze Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) strategies; and presents high-level results for the successful implementation of ICM at three Stage 2 Pioneer Sites, including 1) the U.S. 75 corridor in Dallas, Texas; 2) the I-15 corridor in San Diego, California; and 3) the I-394 corridor in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The following sections provide an overall summary of benefits, followed by brief descriptions of the corridors, operational conditions and ICM strategies analyzed, and summaries of estimated benefits for each corridor. Following these sections is a summary of the analysis methodology employed in the three sites, including model calibration methodology, analysis for different operational conditions, performance measures, analysis plans, and calculation of ICM benefits.

Key concepts: Computer science, Transport engineering, Operations research, Environmental science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Integrated Corridor Management in the U.S. — Analysis, modeling and simulation — Research Paper | ScholarLens