2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Virtual Surface Seismic Data from Downhole Passive Arrays

G. R. T. Schuster

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Monitoring oilfield reservoirs by downhole seismic arrays typically consists of picking traveltimes of direct arrivals and locating the hypocenter of the fracturing rock. The 3-component array typically has no more than a handful of geophones located in one or more wells. To broaden the use of this downhole recording array I propose that it can, in principle, also be used to record 3D VSP data from controlled surface sources. These VSP data with free surface multiples can then be interferometrically transformed into virtual surface seismic reflection data, so that the subsurface reflection coverage is almost the same as a surface seismic experiment. To support this proposal, I present interferometric imaging results from 2D and 3D VSP data. Images from free surface related multiples show that the subsurface reflection illumination is almost as wide as that of a surface seismic experiment and is much larger than that from a conventional VSP image.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Monitoring oilfield reservoirs by downhole seismic arrays typically consists of picking traveltimes of direct arrivals and locating the hypocenter of the fracturing rock. The 3-component array typically has no more than a handful of geophones located in one or more wells. To broaden the use of this downhole recording array I propose that it can, in principle, also be used to record 3D VSP data from controlled surface sources. These VSP data with free surface multiples can then be interferometrically transformed into virtual surface seismic reflection data, so that the subsurface reflection coverage is almost the same as a surface seismic experiment. To support this proposal, I present interferometric imaging results from 2D and 3D VSP data. Images from free surface related multiples show that the subsurface reflection illumination is almost as wide as that of a surface seismic experiment and is much larger than that from a conventional VSP image.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Monitoring oilfield reservoirs by downhole seismic arrays typically consists of picking traveltimes of direct arrivals and locating the hypocenter of the fracturing rock. The 3-component array typically has no more than a handful of geophones located in one or more wells. To broaden the use of this downhole recording array I propose that it can, in principle, also be used to record 3D VSP data from controlled surface sources. These VSP data with free surface multiples can then be interferometrically transformed into virtual surface seismic reflection data, so that the subsurface reflection coverage is almost the same as a surface seismic experiment. To support this proposal, I present interferometric imaging results from 2D and 3D VSP data. Images from free surface related multiples show that the subsurface reflection illumination is almost as wide as that of a surface seismic experiment and is much larger than that from a conventional VSP image.

Key concepts: Geophone, Geology, Reflection (computer programming), Passive seismic, Vertical seismic profile, Seismology, Multiple, Hypocenter

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Virtual Surface Seismic Data from Downhole Passive Arrays — Research Paper | ScholarLens