The performance of literature as argument
Lewis B. Hershey
Abstract
Lewis B. Hershey
Abstract
This article reviews scholarship on the interdependence of rhetoric and poetic language and proposes a performance as argument model for the oral interpretation of literature. The article places the model in the context of current work on the relationship of narrative to argument and suggests the benefits gained from adoption of the model for the generation of critical discourse from performance‐based knowledge.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article reviews scholarship on the interdependence of rhetoric and poetic language and proposes a performance as argument model for the oral interpretation of literature. The article places the model in the context of current work on the relationship of narrative to argument and suggests the benefits gained from adoption of the model for the generation of critical discourse from performance‐based knowledge.
Key concepts: Argument (complex analysis), Scholarship, Rhetoric, Interpretation (philosophy), Epistemology, Context (archaeology), Narrative, Sociology