1997Unpublished venueRequires access

Some Practicable Filtering Techniques for the Constraint Satisfaction Problem.

Romuald Debruyne, Christian Bessière

Open publisher page 156 citations

Abstract

Filtering techniques are essential in order to efficiently solve constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). A blind search often leads to a combinatorial explosion, the algorithm repeatedly finding the same local inconsistencies. Maintaining a local consistency can strongly reduce the search effort especially on hard and large problems. A good illustration are the good time performances on such problems of maintaining arc consistency during search compared to forward checking which maintains a lower level of local consistency. On the one hand, arc consistency (2-consistency) is the most used filtering technique because it cheaply removes some values that cannot belong to any solution. On the other hand, other k-consistencies (k >= 3) have important space and time requirements because they can change the set of constraints. They can only be used on very small CSPs. Thus, in this paper, we study and compare the filtering techniques that are more pruningful than arc consistency while leaving unchanged the set of constraints. As arc consistency, they only remove inconsistent values in the domains, and so, can deal with large CSPs.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Filtering techniques are essential in order to efficiently solve constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). A blind search often leads to a combinatorial explosion, the algorithm repeatedly finding the same local inconsistencies. Maintaining a local consistency can strongly reduce the search effort especially on hard and large problems. A good illustration are the good time performances on such problems of maintaining arc consistency during search compared to forward checking which maintains a lower level of local consistency. On the one hand, arc consistency (2-consistency) is the most used filtering technique because it cheaply removes some values that cannot belong to any solution. On the other hand, other k-consistencies (k >= 3) have important space and time requirements because they can change the set of constraints. They can only be used on very small CSPs. Thus, in this paper, we study and compare the filtering techniques that are more pruningful than arc consistency while leaving unchanged the set of constraints. As arc consistency, they only remove inconsistent values in the domains, and so, can deal with large CSPs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 156 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Filtering techniques are essential in order to efficiently solve constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). A blind search often leads to a combinatorial explosion, the algorithm repeatedly finding the same local inconsistencies. Maintaining a local consistency can strongly reduce the search effort especially on hard and large problems. A good illustration are the good time performances on such problems of maintaining arc consistency during search compared to forward checking which maintains a lower level of local consistency. On the one hand, arc consistency (2-consistency) is the most used filtering technique because it cheaply removes some values that cannot belong to any solution. On the other hand, other k-consistencies (k >= 3) have important space and time requirements because they can change the set of constraints. They can only be used on very small CSPs. Thus, in this paper, we study and compare the filtering techniques that are more pruningful than arc consistency while leaving unchanged the set of constraints. As arc consistency, they only remove inconsistent values in the domains, and so, can deal with large CSPs.

Key concepts: Constraint satisfaction problem, Computer science, Constraint satisfaction dual problem, Constraint satisfaction, Local consistency, Constraint (computer-aided design), Mathematical optimization, Theoretical computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Some Practicable Filtering Techniques for the Constraint Satisfaction Problem. — Research Paper | ScholarLens