2014•Neurology and Clinical NeuroscienceOpen access

Can cystatin C in cerebrospinal fluid be a biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? A lesson from previous studies

Wataru Sako, Shinji Ishimoto

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aim Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an idiopathic and fatal neurodegenerative disease of the motor system that results in loss of upper and lower motor neurons in the brainstem and multiple spinal cord regions. We do not have a useful biomarker for early diagnosis yet. In terms of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), cystatin C is a candidate, but the results are controversial. In the present study, we synthesized the results of published research on cystatin C in CSF to test whether or not cystatin C level was reduced in ALS relative to other neurological disorders (OND) using a meta‐analysis method. Methods Comprehensive literature search yielded four studies that satisfied our inclusion criteria (112 ALS, 72 OND). The outcome of cystatin C concentration was expressed as the standardized mean difference (SMD) between ALS and OND. Results The overall effect of ALS on cystatin C level in CSF was not significantly different from OND (SMD = −0.81, 95% CI −1.78 to 0.16, P = 0.10, four studies, n = 184). This result was based on heterogeneous studies (P < 0.0001, I2 = 88%). We carried out sensitivity analysis with the exclusion of each study sequentially. There was no significant summary effect regardless of any exclusion. Conclusions The present meta‐analysis could not detect a significant difference of cystatin C in CSF between ALS and OND with heterogeneous studies. Here, we mainly discussed the possible cause of heterogeneity, which provided several suggestions for future research.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Background and Aim Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an idiopathic and fatal neurodegenerative disease of the motor system that results in loss of upper and lower motor neurons in the brainstem and multiple spinal cord regions. We do not have a useful biomarker for early diagnosis yet. In terms of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), cystatin C is a candidate, but the results are controversial. In the present study, we synthesized the results of published research on cystatin C in CSF to test whether or not cystatin C level was reduced in ALS relative to other neurological disorders (OND) using a meta‐analysis method. Methods Comprehensive literature search yielded four studies that satisfied our inclusion criteria (112 ALS, 72 OND). The outcome of cystatin C concentration was expressed as the standardized mean difference (SMD) between ALS and OND. Results The overall effect of ALS on cystatin C level in CSF was not significantly different from OND (SMD = −0.81, 95% CI −1.78 to 0.16, P = 0.10, four studies, n = 184). This result was based on heterogeneous studies (P < 0.0001, I2 = 88%). We carried out sensitivity analysis with the exclusion of each study sequentially. There was no significant summary effect regardless of any exclusion. Conclusions The present meta‐analysis could not detect a significant difference of cystatin C in CSF between ALS and OND with heterogeneous studies. Here, we mainly discussed the possible cause of heterogeneity, which provided several suggestions for future research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Background and Aim Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an idiopathic and fatal neurodegenerative disease of the motor system that results in loss of upper and lower motor neurons in the brainstem and multiple spinal cord regions. We do not have a useful biomarker for early diagnosis yet. In terms of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), cystatin C is a candidate, but the results are controversial. In the present study, we synthesized the results of published research on cystatin C in CSF to test whether or not cystatin C level was reduced in ALS relative to other neurological disorders (OND) using a meta‐analysis method. Methods Comprehensive literature search yielded four studies that satisfied our inclusion criteria (112 ALS, 72 OND). The outcome of cystatin C concentration was expressed as the standardized mean difference (SMD) between ALS and OND. Results The overall effect of ALS on cystatin C level in CSF was not significantly different from OND (SMD = −0.81, 95% CI −1.78 to 0.16, P = 0.10, four studies, n = 184). This result was based on heterogeneous studies (P < 0.0001, I2 = 88%). We carried out sensitivity analysis with the exclusion of each study sequentially. There was no significant summary effect regardless of any exclusion. Conclusions The present meta‐analysis could not detect a significant difference of cystatin C in CSF between ALS and OND with heterogeneous studies. Here, we mainly discussed the possible cause of heterogeneity, which provided several suggestions for future research.

Key concepts: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Cystatin C, Medicine, Cerebrospinal fluid, Biomarker, Internal medicine, Brainstem, Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Can cystatin C in cerebrospinal fluid be a biomarker for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? A lesson from previous studies — Research Paper | ScholarLens