Understanding poverty dynamics in Kenya
Patti Kristjanson, Nelson Mango, Anirudh Krishna, Maren Radeny, Nancy L. Johnson
Abstract
Patti Kristjanson, Nelson Mango, Anirudh Krishna, Maren Radeny, Nancy L. Johnson
Abstract
Abstract Combining qualitative–quantitative approaches, we examined the reasons behind household movements into and out of poverty across Kenya, and how they differ by livelihood zones. Among the 4773 households studied, 42 per cent were poor 15 years ago and 50 per cent are poor at the present time. Over the same period, 12 per cent of the households escaped poverty, while another 20 per cent fell into poverty. While some national trends were evident – such as the role of health problems in driving people into poverty and the importance of off‐farm income in getting them out – many reasons differ across livelihood zones, thus this paper provides an example of how regionally differentiated anti‐poverty policies can be investigated and designed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OpenAlex reports 113 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Combining qualitative–quantitative approaches, we examined the reasons behind household movements into and out of poverty across Kenya, and how they differ by livelihood zones. Among the 4773 households studied, 42 per cent were poor 15 years ago and 50 per cent are poor at the present time. Over the same period, 12 per cent of the households escaped poverty, while another 20 per cent fell into poverty. While some national trends were evident – such as the role of health problems in driving people into poverty and the importance of off‐farm income in getting them out – many reasons differ across livelihood zones, thus this paper provides an example of how regionally differentiated anti‐poverty policies can be investigated and designed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Key concepts: Poverty, Livelihood, Socioeconomics, Fell, Development economics, Economics, Poverty rate, Demographic economics