1989Journal of Food ScienceRequires access

Controlled Low‐Temperature Vacuum Dehydration–A New Approach for Low‐Temperature and Low‐Pressure Food Drying

V. An‐Erl King, Robert R. Zall, D.C. Ludington

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The processes of freeze‐drying, vacuum drying and controlled low‐temperature vacuum dehydration (CLTV) were used to dry clam paste and a gelatin‐microcrystalline cellulose model food system. CLTV was carried out as cold as possible without freezing the product. Much less drying time was required for CLTV and vacuum drying than for freeze‐drying. The mass transfer resistance for both freeze‐drying and CLTV was less than that of vacuum drying. Functional properties were closer to those of freeze‐drying than to vacuum drying. CLTV versus freeze‐drying showed a 30% reduction in enthalpy change and 40% reduction in running cost. Microbiological analysis, used to monitor the safety of processing clam paste, showed that the process was satisfactory relative to common parameters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT The processes of freeze‐drying, vacuum drying and controlled low‐temperature vacuum dehydration (CLTV) were used to dry clam paste and a gelatin‐microcrystalline cellulose model food system. CLTV was carried out as cold as possible without freezing the product. Much less drying time was required for CLTV and vacuum drying than for freeze‐drying. The mass transfer resistance for both freeze‐drying and CLTV was less than that of vacuum drying. Functional properties were closer to those of freeze‐drying than to vacuum drying. CLTV versus freeze‐drying showed a 30% reduction in enthalpy change and 40% reduction in running cost. Microbiological analysis, used to monitor the safety of processing clam paste, showed that the process was satisfactory relative to common parameters.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT The processes of freeze‐drying, vacuum drying and controlled low‐temperature vacuum dehydration (CLTV) were used to dry clam paste and a gelatin‐microcrystalline cellulose model food system. CLTV was carried out as cold as possible without freezing the product. Much less drying time was required for CLTV and vacuum drying than for freeze‐drying. The mass transfer resistance for both freeze‐drying and CLTV was less than that of vacuum drying. Functional properties were closer to those of freeze‐drying than to vacuum drying. CLTV versus freeze‐drying showed a 30% reduction in enthalpy change and 40% reduction in running cost. Microbiological analysis, used to monitor the safety of processing clam paste, showed that the process was satisfactory relative to common parameters.

Key concepts: Freeze-drying, Dehydration, Vacuum drying, Gelatin, Chemistry, Microcrystalline cellulose, Mass transfer, Cellulose

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Controlled Low‐Temperature Vacuum Dehydration–A New Approach for Low‐Temperature and Low‐Pressure Food Drying — Research Paper | ScholarLens