2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Assessing Transparency in Government: Rhetoric, Reality and Desire

Maria Cucciniello, Greta Nasi, Giovanni Valotti

Open publisher page 41 citations

Abstract

Transparency in government is a highly regarded value and a critical ingredient for efficient and well-functioning economic and political markets. Many countries, including Italy, refer to transparency as a tool to enhance government accountability, as a principle to promote in order to reduce corruption in public administration and as a means for circulating information on government performance. However, transparency is preached more often than it is practiced in many cases (Heald 2006). Conversely, not all of the information disclosed is easily accessible or accessed by external stakeholders. The purpose of this paper is to assess the degree of transparency of governments and to ascertain the type of information that can be accessed by external stakeholders, especially the general public, in order to evaluate the performance of their government. In particular, the paper focuses on the information disclosed through government websites and assesses the case of larger municipalities in Italy. The paper presents the findings of the analysis and suggests some recommendations for academics and policy makers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transparency in government is a highly regarded value and a critical ingredient for efficient and well-functioning economic and political markets. Many countries, including Italy, refer to transparency as a tool to enhance government accountability, as a principle to promote in order to reduce corruption in public administration and as a means for circulating information on government performance. However, transparency is preached more often than it is practiced in many cases (Heald 2006). Conversely, not all of the information disclosed is easily accessible or accessed by external stakeholders. The purpose of this paper is to assess the degree of transparency of governments and to ascertain the type of information that can be accessed by external stakeholders, especially the general public, in order to evaluate the performance of their government. In particular, the paper focuses on the information disclosed through government websites and assesses the case of larger municipalities in Italy. The paper presents the findings of the analysis and suggests some recommendations for academics and policy makers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transparency in government is a highly regarded value and a critical ingredient for efficient and well-functioning economic and political markets. Many countries, including Italy, refer to transparency as a tool to enhance government accountability, as a principle to promote in order to reduce corruption in public administration and as a means for circulating information on government performance. However, transparency is preached more often than it is practiced in many cases (Heald 2006). Conversely, not all of the information disclosed is easily accessible or accessed by external stakeholders. The purpose of this paper is to assess the degree of transparency of governments and to ascertain the type of information that can be accessed by external stakeholders, especially the general public, in order to evaluate the performance of their government. In particular, the paper focuses on the information disclosed through government websites and assesses the case of larger municipalities in Italy. The paper presents the findings of the analysis and suggests some recommendations for academics and policy makers.

Key concepts: Transparency (behavior), Accountability, Government (linguistics), Public relations, Politics, Language change, Order (exchange), Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessing Transparency in Government: Rhetoric, Reality and Desire — Research Paper | ScholarLens