1996Unpublished venueRequires access

A Prospective Analysis of Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Traumatic Disruption of the Aorta

Gayle Minard, Michael J. Schurr, Martin A. Croce, Morris L. Gavant, Kenneth A. Kudsk, Martha J. Taylor, F. Elizabeth Pritchard, Timothy C. Fabian

Open publisher page 84 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recently, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been proposed as the standard for the diagnosis of traumatic disruption of the aorta (TDA), replacing aortography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and practicality of TEE in the diagnosis of TDA. DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with blunt trauma admitted with a suspected diagnosis of TDA were evaluated with TEE and aortography. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were evaluated with TEE and aortography. TEE was unsuccessful in five patients (15%). Of the remaining 29 patients, TEE results were true-positive in four and true-negative in 20. TEE results were false-positive in two patients, and three injuries were missed (two were proximal to the left subclavian artery, and one was a localized aortic disruption). Sensitivity and specificity of TEE were 57% and 91%, respectively, compared with aortography, for which sensitivity was 89% and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSION: Although the use of TEE in the diagnosis of TDA has several advantages, it is not more accurate than aortography. TEE should not replace aortography as the standard for the diagnosis of TDA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Recently, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been proposed as the standard for the diagnosis of traumatic disruption of the aorta (TDA), replacing aortography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and practicality of TEE in the diagnosis of TDA. DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with blunt trauma admitted with a suspected diagnosis of TDA were evaluated with TEE and aortography. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were evaluated with TEE and aortography. TEE was unsuccessful in five patients (15%). Of the remaining 29 patients, TEE results were true-positive in four and true-negative in 20. TEE results were false-positive in two patients, and three injuries were missed (two were proximal to the left subclavian artery, and one was a localized aortic disruption). Sensitivity and specificity of TEE were 57% and 91%, respectively, compared with aortography, for which sensitivity was 89% and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSION: Although the use of TEE in the diagnosis of TDA has several advantages, it is not more accurate than aortography. TEE should not replace aortography as the standard for the diagnosis of TDA.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 84 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recently, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been proposed as the standard for the diagnosis of traumatic disruption of the aorta (TDA), replacing aortography. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and practicality of TEE in the diagnosis of TDA. DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with blunt trauma admitted with a suspected diagnosis of TDA were evaluated with TEE and aortography. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were evaluated with TEE and aortography. TEE was unsuccessful in five patients (15%). Of the remaining 29 patients, TEE results were true-positive in four and true-negative in 20. TEE results were false-positive in two patients, and three injuries were missed (two were proximal to the left subclavian artery, and one was a localized aortic disruption). Sensitivity and specificity of TEE were 57% and 91%, respectively, compared with aortography, for which sensitivity was 89% and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSION: Although the use of TEE in the diagnosis of TDA has several advantages, it is not more accurate than aortography. TEE should not replace aortography as the standard for the diagnosis of TDA.

Key concepts: Cardiology, Medicine, Internal medicine, Aorta, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Prospective Analysis of Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Traumatic Disruption of the Aorta — Research Paper | ScholarLens