1980The American Journal of Surgical PathologyRequires access

Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence in lymph node biopsies

Stephen E. Vernon, Klaus J. Lewin

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

A comparison study was made of staining for immunoglobulin by immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase in 23 lymph node biopsies. Cryostat sections were stained for immunoglobulins using a direct technique while paraffin-embedded sections were stained for immunoglobulins using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) technique. Of 23 cases studied, including seven reactive hyperplasias and 16 lymphoid cancers, there was agreement between the two techniques in 18 cases. Nine of 14 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas showed agreement of results. All reactive hyperplasias showed complete agreement and had a distinctive pattern by both immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase. Fixation, reagent specificity, and sensitivity of the methods may account for some of the discrepancies noted. Immunoperoxidase staining may be a useful diagnostic aid, particularly when immunofluorescent staining is not possible.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A comparison study was made of staining for immunoglobulin by immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase in 23 lymph node biopsies. Cryostat sections were stained for immunoglobulins using a direct technique while paraffin-embedded sections were stained for immunoglobulins using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) technique. Of 23 cases studied, including seven reactive hyperplasias and 16 lymphoid cancers, there was agreement between the two techniques in 18 cases. Nine of 14 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas showed agreement of results. All reactive hyperplasias showed complete agreement and had a distinctive pattern by both immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase. Fixation, reagent specificity, and sensitivity of the methods may account for some of the discrepancies noted. Immunoperoxidase staining may be a useful diagnostic aid, particularly when immunofluorescent staining is not possible.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A comparison study was made of staining for immunoglobulin by immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase in 23 lymph node biopsies. Cryostat sections were stained for immunoglobulins using a direct technique while paraffin-embedded sections were stained for immunoglobulins using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) technique. Of 23 cases studied, including seven reactive hyperplasias and 16 lymphoid cancers, there was agreement between the two techniques in 18 cases. Nine of 14 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas showed agreement of results. All reactive hyperplasias showed complete agreement and had a distinctive pattern by both immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase. Fixation, reagent specificity, and sensitivity of the methods may account for some of the discrepancies noted. Immunoperoxidase staining may be a useful diagnostic aid, particularly when immunofluorescent staining is not possible.

Key concepts: Immunoperoxidase, Pathology, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Lymph node, Antibody, Biopsy, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence in lymph node biopsies — Research Paper | ScholarLens