Immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence in lymph node biopsies
Stephen E. Vernon, Klaus J. Lewin
Abstract
Stephen E. Vernon, Klaus J. Lewin
Abstract
A comparison study was made of staining for immunoglobulin by immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase in 23 lymph node biopsies. Cryostat sections were stained for immunoglobulins using a direct technique while paraffin-embedded sections were stained for immunoglobulins using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) technique. Of 23 cases studied, including seven reactive hyperplasias and 16 lymphoid cancers, there was agreement between the two techniques in 18 cases. Nine of 14 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas showed agreement of results. All reactive hyperplasias showed complete agreement and had a distinctive pattern by both immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase. Fixation, reagent specificity, and sensitivity of the methods may account for some of the discrepancies noted. Immunoperoxidase staining may be a useful diagnostic aid, particularly when immunofluorescent staining is not possible.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A comparison study was made of staining for immunoglobulin by immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase in 23 lymph node biopsies. Cryostat sections were stained for immunoglobulins using a direct technique while paraffin-embedded sections were stained for immunoglobulins using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) technique. Of 23 cases studied, including seven reactive hyperplasias and 16 lymphoid cancers, there was agreement between the two techniques in 18 cases. Nine of 14 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas showed agreement of results. All reactive hyperplasias showed complete agreement and had a distinctive pattern by both immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase. Fixation, reagent specificity, and sensitivity of the methods may account for some of the discrepancies noted. Immunoperoxidase staining may be a useful diagnostic aid, particularly when immunofluorescent staining is not possible.
Key concepts: Immunoperoxidase, Pathology, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Lymph node, Antibody, Biopsy, Medicine