2000Analytical ChemistryRequires access

A Comparison of Liquid Hydrocarbon Calibration Standards in Piston Cylinders and Standard Cylinders with Eductor Tubes

Robert Benesch, Tracey Jacksier

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Natural gas liquid standards consist of various components primarily in the C1-C6 range; they are available in three types of cylinder packages: piston cylinders and two other types of standard cylinders with eductor tubes. The three cylinder packages have different operation conditions and thus a sample may behave differently in each of the packages. The piston cylinder maintains the components in a single liquid phase at a constant pressure, while the standard cylinders maintain the components as a two-phase mixture. Typically, the components may distribute between the two phases in different concentrations depending on the various thermodynamic variables, such as temperature, pressure, and volume. This study will examine the integrity of the sample in the three cylinder packages during a controlled cylinder depletion. The results for the various cylinders will be compared with a theoretical model of the experiments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Natural gas liquid standards consist of various components primarily in the C1-C6 range; they are available in three types of cylinder packages: piston cylinders and two other types of standard cylinders with eductor tubes. The three cylinder packages have different operation conditions and thus a sample may behave differently in each of the packages. The piston cylinder maintains the components in a single liquid phase at a constant pressure, while the standard cylinders maintain the components as a two-phase mixture. Typically, the components may distribute between the two phases in different concentrations depending on the various thermodynamic variables, such as temperature, pressure, and volume. This study will examine the integrity of the sample in the three cylinder packages during a controlled cylinder depletion. The results for the various cylinders will be compared with a theoretical model of the experiments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Natural gas liquid standards consist of various components primarily in the C1-C6 range; they are available in three types of cylinder packages: piston cylinders and two other types of standard cylinders with eductor tubes. The three cylinder packages have different operation conditions and thus a sample may behave differently in each of the packages. The piston cylinder maintains the components in a single liquid phase at a constant pressure, while the standard cylinders maintain the components as a two-phase mixture. Typically, the components may distribute between the two phases in different concentrations depending on the various thermodynamic variables, such as temperature, pressure, and volume. This study will examine the integrity of the sample in the three cylinder packages during a controlled cylinder depletion. The results for the various cylinders will be compared with a theoretical model of the experiments.

Key concepts: Piston (optics), Cylinder, Pneumatic cylinder, Calibration, Chemistry, Mechanics, Volume (thermodynamics), Position-sensing hydraulic cylinder

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparison of Liquid Hydrocarbon Calibration Standards in Piston Cylinders and Standard Cylinders with Eductor Tubes — Research Paper | ScholarLens