1996•IbisRequires access

The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions

Richard E. Major, CAITLIN E. KENDAL

Open publisher page 458 citations

Abstract

Artificial nest experiments have been used in approximately 80 recent studies to identify a wide range of factors influencing reproductive success of birds. Despite the same factors being examined in different studies, few consistent patterns have emerged from these experiments. Analysis of reproductive success at artificial and natural nests reveals that reproductive success measured with use of artificial nests is frequently underestimated. In addition, several studies suggest that different species of predators may be differentially attracted to the two types of nest. These results call the utility of artificial nests into question as a tool for elucidating factors influencing the success of natural nests. Analysis of the methodology used in artificial nest experiments reveals that in general there is poor correspondence between the appearance of experimental setups and the natural systems they attempt to model. If future experiments with artificial nests are to contribute to theory, the quality of experiments must improve and the assumptions underlying the artificial approach must be tested. Collecting this information will be relatively simple compared with the time‐consuming task of experimenting with natural nests. Until these data are collected, conclusions about nesting ecology derived from the use of artificial nest experiments should be treated as preliminary.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Artificial nest experiments have been used in approximately 80 recent studies to identify a wide range of factors influencing reproductive success of birds. Despite the same factors being examined in different studies, few consistent patterns have emerged from these experiments. Analysis of reproductive success at artificial and natural nests reveals that reproductive success measured with use of artificial nests is frequently underestimated. In addition, several studies suggest that different species of predators may be differentially attracted to the two types of nest. These results call the utility of artificial nests into question as a tool for elucidating factors influencing the success of natural nests. Analysis of the methodology used in artificial nest experiments reveals that in general there is poor correspondence between the appearance of experimental setups and the natural systems they attempt to model. If future experiments with artificial nests are to contribute to theory, the quality of experiments must improve and the assumptions underlying the artificial approach must be tested. Collecting this information will be relatively simple compared with the time‐consuming task of experimenting with natural nests. Until these data are collected, conclusions about nesting ecology derived from the use of artificial nest experiments should be treated as preliminary.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 458 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Artificial nest experiments have been used in approximately 80 recent studies to identify a wide range of factors influencing reproductive success of birds. Despite the same factors being examined in different studies, few consistent patterns have emerged from these experiments. Analysis of reproductive success at artificial and natural nests reveals that reproductive success measured with use of artificial nests is frequently underestimated. In addition, several studies suggest that different species of predators may be differentially attracted to the two types of nest. These results call the utility of artificial nests into question as a tool for elucidating factors influencing the success of natural nests. Analysis of the methodology used in artificial nest experiments reveals that in general there is poor correspondence between the appearance of experimental setups and the natural systems they attempt to model. If future experiments with artificial nests are to contribute to theory, the quality of experiments must improve and the assumptions underlying the artificial approach must be tested. Collecting this information will be relatively simple compared with the time‐consuming task of experimenting with natural nests. Until these data are collected, conclusions about nesting ecology derived from the use of artificial nest experiments should be treated as preliminary.

Key concepts: Nest (protein structural motif), Reproductive success, Zoology, Biology, Medicine, Environmental health, Biochemistry, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The contribution of artificial nest experiments to understanding avian reproductive success: a review of methods and conclusions — Research Paper | ScholarLens