2010Unpublished venueRequires access

An Evaluation Framework for Content Recommender Systems The Industry Perspective

Calin Ciordas, Jeroen M. Doumen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Recommender systems are a reality today. Evaluating recommender systems is difficult because of their extreme diversity. Many aspects need to be considered to be able to benchmark recommender systems against each other. This paper proposes an evaluation framework for content recommender systems which goes beyond traditional prediction accuracy. The first aspects to be considered relate to the input required for the correct functioning of the recommender system, to the output it produces and the usage of this output. Other aspects relate to how suitable the content recommender system is for the one deploying it, for the ones using it, as well as in today's world, inherently multidevice and with multiple sources of content. The quality of recommendations and the user experience they enable are key to the evaluation. Deployment aspects of content recommender systems, usually forgotten, complete this framework. The proposed evaluation framework provides a complete picture of the strenghts and weaknesses of content recommender systems from the industry perspective.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recommender systems are a reality today. Evaluating recommender systems is difficult because of their extreme diversity. Many aspects need to be considered to be able to benchmark recommender systems against each other. This paper proposes an evaluation framework for content recommender systems which goes beyond traditional prediction accuracy. The first aspects to be considered relate to the input required for the correct functioning of the recommender system, to the output it produces and the usage of this output. Other aspects relate to how suitable the content recommender system is for the one deploying it, for the ones using it, as well as in today's world, inherently multidevice and with multiple sources of content. The quality of recommendations and the user experience they enable are key to the evaluation. Deployment aspects of content recommender systems, usually forgotten, complete this framework. The proposed evaluation framework provides a complete picture of the strenghts and weaknesses of content recommender systems from the industry perspective.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recommender systems are a reality today. Evaluating recommender systems is difficult because of their extreme diversity. Many aspects need to be considered to be able to benchmark recommender systems against each other. This paper proposes an evaluation framework for content recommender systems which goes beyond traditional prediction accuracy. The first aspects to be considered relate to the input required for the correct functioning of the recommender system, to the output it produces and the usage of this output. Other aspects relate to how suitable the content recommender system is for the one deploying it, for the ones using it, as well as in today's world, inherently multidevice and with multiple sources of content. The quality of recommendations and the user experience they enable are key to the evaluation. Deployment aspects of content recommender systems, usually forgotten, complete this framework. The proposed evaluation framework provides a complete picture of the strenghts and weaknesses of content recommender systems from the industry perspective.

Key concepts: Recommender system, Computer science, Perspective (graphical), Benchmark (surveying), Software deployment, Quality (philosophy), Key (lock), Content (measure theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Evaluation Framework for Content Recommender Systems The Industry Perspective — Research Paper | ScholarLens