2009ComitatusRequires access

Enacting Ties that Bind: Oath-Making vs. Oath-Taking in the Finnsburg “Episode”

Keri Wolf

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Drawing upon the theories of Henri Lefebvre, this article examines the mead hall as social space, focusing on the spatial context of the heroic oath in Old English poetry. It demonstrates that when thanes and lords recollect oath-making ceremonies in Beowulf and The Battle of Maldon , they reflect upon the spatial situation of the oath (in the hall while drinking mead and sitting upon the mead bench), indicating that these components make the oath binding. Appearances of these “conventional” oath-making spatial components contrast with the oath-taking scene in the Finnsburg “Episode,” in which these components are absent or tempered, suggesting that Hengest will not keep the peace treaty with Finn. By implication, the poet could have intended to hint that Hengest is a traitor who will not fulfill the oath or to downplay the fact that Hengest breaks his oath to Finn to keep a prior oath to Hnaef.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Drawing upon the theories of Henri Lefebvre, this article examines the mead hall as social space, focusing on the spatial context of the heroic oath in Old English poetry. It demonstrates that when thanes and lords recollect oath-making ceremonies in Beowulf and The Battle of Maldon , they reflect upon the spatial situation of the oath (in the hall while drinking mead and sitting upon the mead bench), indicating that these components make the oath binding. Appearances of these “conventional” oath-making spatial components contrast with the oath-taking scene in the Finnsburg “Episode,” in which these components are absent or tempered, suggesting that Hengest will not keep the peace treaty with Finn. By implication, the poet could have intended to hint that Hengest is a traitor who will not fulfill the oath or to downplay the fact that Hengest breaks his oath to Finn to keep a prior oath to Hnaef.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Drawing upon the theories of Henri Lefebvre, this article examines the mead hall as social space, focusing on the spatial context of the heroic oath in Old English poetry. It demonstrates that when thanes and lords recollect oath-making ceremonies in Beowulf and The Battle of Maldon , they reflect upon the spatial situation of the oath (in the hall while drinking mead and sitting upon the mead bench), indicating that these components make the oath binding. Appearances of these “conventional” oath-making spatial components contrast with the oath-taking scene in the Finnsburg “Episode,” in which these components are absent or tempered, suggesting that Hengest will not keep the peace treaty with Finn. By implication, the poet could have intended to hint that Hengest is a traitor who will not fulfill the oath or to downplay the fact that Hengest breaks his oath to Finn to keep a prior oath to Hnaef.

Key concepts: Oath, Battle, Context (archaeology), Law, Philosophy, Art, Sociology, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enacting Ties that Bind: Oath-Making vs. Oath-Taking in the Finnsburg “Episode” — Research Paper | ScholarLens