2013AIP conference proceedingsOpen access

Advances in post-necking flow curve identification of sheet metal through standard tensile testing

Sam Coppieters, Steven Cooreman, Dimitri Debruyne, Toshihiko Kuwabara

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The standard tensile test is still the most common material test to identify the hardening behavior of sheet metal.When using standard equipment and well-known analytical formulas, however, the hardening behavior can only be identified up to the point of maximum uniform elongation.Several methods which deal with the problem of extended flow curve identification of sheet metal through a tensile test have been proposed in the past.This paper gives an overview of the four classes of methods to identify post-necking hardening behavior of sheet metal through tensile testing.In addition, identification methods from the first (average values across the neck), second (Bridgeman correction, modified Siebel and Schwaigerer correction) and third class (special case of the VFM) are used to identify the post-necking hardening behavior of DC05.Finally, these results are used to assess the validity of the different methods.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The standard tensile test is still the most common material test to identify the hardening behavior of sheet metal.When using standard equipment and well-known analytical formulas, however, the hardening behavior can only be identified up to the point of maximum uniform elongation.Several methods which deal with the problem of extended flow curve identification of sheet metal through a tensile test have been proposed in the past.This paper gives an overview of the four classes of methods to identify post-necking hardening behavior of sheet metal through tensile testing.In addition, identification methods from the first (average values across the neck), second (Bridgeman correction, modified Siebel and Schwaigerer correction) and third class (special case of the VFM) are used to identify the post-necking hardening behavior of DC05.Finally, these results are used to assess the validity of the different methods.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The standard tensile test is still the most common material test to identify the hardening behavior of sheet metal.When using standard equipment and well-known analytical formulas, however, the hardening behavior can only be identified up to the point of maximum uniform elongation.Several methods which deal with the problem of extended flow curve identification of sheet metal through a tensile test have been proposed in the past.This paper gives an overview of the four classes of methods to identify post-necking hardening behavior of sheet metal through tensile testing.In addition, identification methods from the first (average values across the neck), second (Bridgeman correction, modified Siebel and Schwaigerer correction) and third class (special case of the VFM) are used to identify the post-necking hardening behavior of DC05.Finally, these results are used to assess the validity of the different methods.

Key concepts: Necking, Tensile testing, Sheet metal, Ultimate tensile strength, Hardening (computing), Materials science, Strain hardening exponent, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Advances in post-necking flow curve identification of sheet metal through standard tensile testing — Research Paper | ScholarLens