A Semantic Differential Instrument for Measuring Attitude Toward Mathematics
Earl L. McCallon, J. D. Brown
Abstract
Earl L. McCallon, J. D. Brown
Abstract
A semantic differential was developed to measure attitude toward mathematics. This instrument was contrasted with a Likert type attitude instrument constructed by Aiken and Dreger (1, 2). There were 68 male and female subjects, all of whom were non-mathematics majors enrolled in a required doctoral level statistics class in the College of Education of a large state university in the southwest. The correlation between the two instruments was r = .90. It was concluded that the semantic differential constructed for this study was as effective a measure of attitude toward mathematics as the Likert type instrument. Analysis of the data also indicated that people possessing favorable and unfavorable attitudes toward mathematics differed to the greatest extent on the evaluative scales of the semantic differential, thus lending construct validity to the semantic differential.
OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A semantic differential was developed to measure attitude toward mathematics. This instrument was contrasted with a Likert type attitude instrument constructed by Aiken and Dreger (1, 2). There were 68 male and female subjects, all of whom were non-mathematics majors enrolled in a required doctoral level statistics class in the College of Education of a large state university in the southwest. The correlation between the two instruments was r = .90. It was concluded that the semantic differential constructed for this study was as effective a measure of attitude toward mathematics as the Likert type instrument. Analysis of the data also indicated that people possessing favorable and unfavorable attitudes toward mathematics differed to the greatest extent on the evaluative scales of the semantic differential, thus lending construct validity to the semantic differential.
Key concepts: Semantic differential, Likert scale, Differential (mechanical device), Construct (python library), Measure (data warehouse), Class (philosophy), Mathematics education, Construct validity