Ceftriaxone plus Conventional or Single-Daily Dose Amikacin versus Ceftazidime/Amikacin as Empiric Therapy in Febrile Neutropenic Patients
Franco Leoni, Stefania Ciolli, Anna Pascarella, Rosa Fanci, Roberto Caporale, P. L. Rossi Ferrini
Abstract
Franco Leoni, Stefania Ciolli, Anna Pascarella, Rosa Fanci, Roberto Caporale, P. L. Rossi Ferrini
Abstract
Results of antibiotic treatment in 144 febrile episodes during drug-induced granulocytopenia are reported. 63 episodes were treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin and 81 with ceftriaxone (CFX) using single daily doses combined with amikacin either divided in three doses (CFX-1 group) or administered as single doses (CFX-2 group). The response rates were 51, 80, and 57% respectively. In this study CFX was more effective than ceftazidime and amikacin provided better results when administered using the standard 8-hour scheduling.
OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Results of antibiotic treatment in 144 febrile episodes during drug-induced granulocytopenia are reported. 63 episodes were treated with ceftazidime plus amikacin and 81 with ceftriaxone (CFX) using single daily doses combined with amikacin either divided in three doses (CFX-1 group) or administered as single doses (CFX-2 group). The response rates were 51, 80, and 57% respectively. In this study CFX was more effective than ceftazidime and amikacin provided better results when administered using the standard 8-hour scheduling.
Key concepts: Amikacin, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone, Medicine, Empiric therapy, Cefepime, Cefotaxime, Febrile neutropenia