A Parameter Study of Type II Supernova Light Curves Using 6M⊙He Cores
T. R. Young
Abstract
Open-access reader
T. R. Young
Abstract
Open-access reader
Results of numerical calculations of Type II supernova light curves are presented. The model progenitor stars have 6 M ☉ cores and various envelopes, originating from a numerically evolved 20 M ☉ star. Five parameters that affect the light curves are examined: the ejected mass, the progenitor radius, the explosion energy, the 56 Ni mass, and the extent of 56 Ni mixing. The following effects have been found: (1) the larger the progenitor radius, the brighter the early-time light curve, with little effect on the late-time light curve; (2) the larger the envelope mass, the fainter the early light curve and the flatter the slope of the late light curve; (3) the larger the explosion energy, the brighter the early light curve and the steeper the slope of the late light curve; (4) the larger the 56 Ni mass, the brighter the overall light curve after 20-50 days, with no effect on the early light curve; and (5) the more extensive the 56 Ni mixing, the brighter the early light curve and the steeper the late light curve. The primary parameters affecting the light-curve shape are the progenitor radius and the ejected mass. The secondary parameters are the explosion energy, 56 Ni mass, and 56 Ni mixing. I find that while in principle the general shape and absolute magnitude of a light curve indicate a unique set of parameters, in practice it is difficult to avoid some ambiguity in the parameters. I find that the nickel-powered diffusion wave and the recombination of helium produce a prominent secondary peak in all our calculations. The feature is less prominent when compositional mixing, both 56 Ni mixing and mixing between the hydrogen and helium layers, occurs. The model photospheric temperatures and velocities are presented, for comparison to observation.
OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Results of numerical calculations of Type II supernova light curves are presented. The model progenitor stars have 6 M ☉ cores and various envelopes, originating from a numerically evolved 20 M ☉ star. Five parameters that affect the light curves are examined: the ejected mass, the progenitor radius, the explosion energy, the 56 Ni mass, and the extent of 56 Ni mixing. The following effects have been found: (1) the larger the progenitor radius, the brighter the early-time light curve, with little effect on the late-time light curve; (2) the larger the envelope mass, the fainter the early light curve and the flatter the slope of the late light curve; (3) the larger the explosion energy, the brighter the early light curve and the steeper the slope of the late light curve; (4) the larger the 56 Ni mass, the brighter the overall light curve after 20-50 days, with no effect on the early light curve; and (5) the more extensive the 56 Ni mixing, the brighter the early light curve and the steeper the late light curve. The primary parameters affecting the light-curve shape are the progenitor radius and the ejected mass. The secondary parameters are the explosion energy, 56 Ni mass, and 56 Ni mixing. I find that while in principle the general shape and absolute magnitude of a light curve indicate a unique set of parameters, in practice it is difficult to avoid some ambiguity in the parameters. I find that the nickel-powered diffusion wave and the recombination of helium produce a prominent secondary peak in all our calculations. The feature is less prominent when compositional mixing, both 56 Ni mixing and mixing between the hydrogen and helium layers, occurs. The model photospheric temperatures and velocities are presented, for comparison to observation.
Key concepts: Light curve, Supernova, RADIUS, Physics, Astrophysics, Stars, Computer science, Computer security