2006Journal of Biological SciencesRequires access

Comparison of Different Laboratory Methods for Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori

Nourkhoda Sadeghifard, Mohammad Mehdi Aslani, Amir Ghasemi

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare four laboratory methods for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. 101 sets of four antral biopsies were collected from 101 patients, one of the biopsies in each set were tested by rapid urease test, other three biopsies were used for culture, direct staining and histopathology, respectively. By culture method in 62 cases (61.3), Helicobacterpylori were isolated. Among several primary media that tested in this study, Brucella agar supplemented with 10 whole sheep blood supported relatively good growth of H. pylori. In present study 65 cases (64.3) were positive by rapid urease test. Of 101 biopsy specimens in 68 cases (67.3) were obtained positive result by histopathology method (Gimsa Staining). Sensitivity and specificity of direct staining test were 89.7 and 96.9, respectively. We found histopathology method was the best method for diagnosis of H. pylori and it can be selected as gold standard in detection of Helicobacter pylori. © 2006 Asian Network for Scientific Information.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of the present study was to compare four laboratory methods for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. 101 sets of four antral biopsies were collected from 101 patients, one of the biopsies in each set were tested by rapid urease test, other three biopsies were used for culture, direct staining and histopathology, respectively. By culture method in 62 cases (61.3), Helicobacterpylori were isolated. Among several primary media that tested in this study, Brucella agar supplemented with 10 whole sheep blood supported relatively good growth of H. pylori. In present study 65 cases (64.3) were positive by rapid urease test. Of 101 biopsy specimens in 68 cases (67.3) were obtained positive result by histopathology method (Gimsa Staining). Sensitivity and specificity of direct staining test were 89.7 and 96.9, respectively. We found histopathology method was the best method for diagnosis of H. pylori and it can be selected as gold standard in detection of Helicobacter pylori. © 2006 Asian Network for Scientific Information.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare four laboratory methods for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. 101 sets of four antral biopsies were collected from 101 patients, one of the biopsies in each set were tested by rapid urease test, other three biopsies were used for culture, direct staining and histopathology, respectively. By culture method in 62 cases (61.3), Helicobacterpylori were isolated. Among several primary media that tested in this study, Brucella agar supplemented with 10 whole sheep blood supported relatively good growth of H. pylori. In present study 65 cases (64.3) were positive by rapid urease test. Of 101 biopsy specimens in 68 cases (67.3) were obtained positive result by histopathology method (Gimsa Staining). Sensitivity and specificity of direct staining test were 89.7 and 96.9, respectively. We found histopathology method was the best method for diagnosis of H. pylori and it can be selected as gold standard in detection of Helicobacter pylori. © 2006 Asian Network for Scientific Information.

Key concepts: Helicobacter pylori, Medicine, Microbiology, Gastroenterology, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Different Laboratory Methods for Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori — Research Paper | ScholarLens