Agricultural Tithing and (Flat) Tax Complexity
Adam Chodorow
Abstract
Open-access reader
Adam Chodorow
Abstract
Open-access reader
Tax complexity has been of major concern to legislators and academics almost since the first income tax was enacted in 1913, and scholars have generated a large and varied body of scholarship on the subject. Some scholars have explored the causes and nature of complexity, while others have focused on how best to simplify the current income tax, while keeping its major design features in place. Those interested in more radical reform of the current tax system have seized on the purported complexity of controversial provisions, such as the progressive rate structure and the tax preference for capital gains, to justify the elimination of those features. More recently, consumption tax advocates have claimed that such taxes are inherently less complex than the income tax, and therefore, we should replace the income tax altogether with some form of consumption tax. Indeed, Steve Forbes has repeatedly argued that his preferred form of consumption tax is so straightforward that we can calculate our taxes using a simple postcard and abolish the IRS in the process.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Tax complexity has been of major concern to legislators and academics almost since the first income tax was enacted in 1913, and scholars have generated a large and varied body of scholarship on the subject. Some scholars have explored the causes and nature of complexity, while others have focused on how best to simplify the current income tax, while keeping its major design features in place. Those interested in more radical reform of the current tax system have seized on the purported complexity of controversial provisions, such as the progressive rate structure and the tax preference for capital gains, to justify the elimination of those features. More recently, consumption tax advocates have claimed that such taxes are inherently less complex than the income tax, and therefore, we should replace the income tax altogether with some form of consumption tax. Indeed, Steve Forbes has repeatedly argued that his preferred form of consumption tax is so straightforward that we can calculate our taxes using a simple postcard and abolish the IRS in the process.
Key concepts: State income tax, Economics, Indirect tax, Gross income, Consumption tax, Tax reform, Public economics, Value-added tax