1999•Journal of Synthetic LubricationRequires access

Film‐forming tendencies of some base fluids and viscosity modifiers

Hyunsoo Hong, Scott Slaybaugh Bair

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The film‐forming tendencies of selected mineral base oils and synthetic base fluids were investigated with and without conventional GL‐5 additive packages. A pressurised falling‐body viscometer and a concentrated contact simulator were used to measure low‐shear viscosities, central film thicknesses, and traction coefficients. Analysis of the mineral—based oils showed that a paraffinic base oil and a naphthenic base oil had similar film thicknesses, even though the naphthenic base oil has higher pressure‐viscosity coefficients. A very high viscosity index oil gave thinner film thicknesses and lower pressure—viscosity coefficients than the paraffinic or naphthenic base oils. Analysis of the synthetic base fluids showed that a PAO‐4 base fluid gave thicker film thicknesses than an ester base fluid. The analysis of fully‐formulated oils showed that the PAO‐4 oil containing a proprietary polyolefin provided a similar filnz thickness to the PAO‐4 oil containing a more expensive PAO‐100.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The film‐forming tendencies of selected mineral base oils and synthetic base fluids were investigated with and without conventional GL‐5 additive packages. A pressurised falling‐body viscometer and a concentrated contact simulator were used to measure low‐shear viscosities, central film thicknesses, and traction coefficients. Analysis of the mineral—based oils showed that a paraffinic base oil and a naphthenic base oil had similar film thicknesses, even though the naphthenic base oil has higher pressure‐viscosity coefficients. A very high viscosity index oil gave thinner film thicknesses and lower pressure—viscosity coefficients than the paraffinic or naphthenic base oils. Analysis of the synthetic base fluids showed that a PAO‐4 base fluid gave thicker film thicknesses than an ester base fluid. The analysis of fully‐formulated oils showed that the PAO‐4 oil containing a proprietary polyolefin provided a similar filnz thickness to the PAO‐4 oil containing a more expensive PAO‐100.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The film‐forming tendencies of selected mineral base oils and synthetic base fluids were investigated with and without conventional GL‐5 additive packages. A pressurised falling‐body viscometer and a concentrated contact simulator were used to measure low‐shear viscosities, central film thicknesses, and traction coefficients. Analysis of the mineral—based oils showed that a paraffinic base oil and a naphthenic base oil had similar film thicknesses, even though the naphthenic base oil has higher pressure‐viscosity coefficients. A very high viscosity index oil gave thinner film thicknesses and lower pressure—viscosity coefficients than the paraffinic or naphthenic base oils. Analysis of the synthetic base fluids showed that a PAO‐4 base fluid gave thicker film thicknesses than an ester base fluid. The analysis of fully‐formulated oils showed that the PAO‐4 oil containing a proprietary polyolefin provided a similar filnz thickness to the PAO‐4 oil containing a more expensive PAO‐100.

Key concepts: Base oil, Viscosity index, Viscometer, Base (topology), Mineral oil, Viscosity, Materials science, Polyolefin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Film‐forming tendencies of some base fluids and viscosity modifiers — Research Paper | ScholarLens