2000North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementRequires access

Evaluation of a Backpack Electrofishing Unit for Multiple Lake Surveys of Fish Assemblage Structure

Peter D. Vaux, Thomas R. Whittier, Gregory DeCesare, James P. Kurtenbach

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of a portable, backpack electrofishing unit, used from a small boat, for sampling fish assemblage structure in 11 lakes in the northeastern United States. Samples collected with a boat-mounted, 350-W backpack unit (EF-BP) were compared with samples taken by (1) two 5,000-W electrofishing units, (2) gill nets, (3) trap nets and minnow traps, and (4) seines. The EF-BP was more effective than the nonelectrofishing gears, capturing a mean of 79% of a lake's documented fish species pool. Gill nets, beach seines, and trap nets captured, on average, about 50% of the species; minnow traps were least efficient. With identical transect times, the EF-BP was as effective as a standard barge-mounted electrofishing unit for capturing species and numbers of individuals. At three low-conductivity lakes, the EF-BP collected fewer species and individuals than a semiportable 5,000-W unit but was more effective than any of the nonelectrofishing gears. Analysis of species accumulation curves for the EF-BP indicated that three or four 4-min electrofishing of transects were sufficient to collect a reasonably complete sample of the available species pool in lakes smaller than 20 ha; in larger lakes up to 900 ha, as many as nine transects were required to achieve a similar degree of sampling sufficiency.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We evaluated the effectiveness of a portable, backpack electrofishing unit, used from a small boat, for sampling fish assemblage structure in 11 lakes in the northeastern United States. Samples collected with a boat-mounted, 350-W backpack unit (EF-BP) were compared with samples taken by (1) two 5,000-W electrofishing units, (2) gill nets, (3) trap nets and minnow traps, and (4) seines. The EF-BP was more effective than the nonelectrofishing gears, capturing a mean of 79% of a lake's documented fish species pool. Gill nets, beach seines, and trap nets captured, on average, about 50% of the species; minnow traps were least efficient. With identical transect times, the EF-BP was as effective as a standard barge-mounted electrofishing unit for capturing species and numbers of individuals. At three low-conductivity lakes, the EF-BP collected fewer species and individuals than a semiportable 5,000-W unit but was more effective than any of the nonelectrofishing gears. Analysis of species accumulation curves for the EF-BP indicated that three or four 4-min electrofishing of transects were sufficient to collect a reasonably complete sample of the available species pool in lakes smaller than 20 ha; in larger lakes up to 900 ha, as many as nine transects were required to achieve a similar degree of sampling sufficiency.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We evaluated the effectiveness of a portable, backpack electrofishing unit, used from a small boat, for sampling fish assemblage structure in 11 lakes in the northeastern United States. Samples collected with a boat-mounted, 350-W backpack unit (EF-BP) were compared with samples taken by (1) two 5,000-W electrofishing units, (2) gill nets, (3) trap nets and minnow traps, and (4) seines. The EF-BP was more effective than the nonelectrofishing gears, capturing a mean of 79% of a lake's documented fish species pool. Gill nets, beach seines, and trap nets captured, on average, about 50% of the species; minnow traps were least efficient. With identical transect times, the EF-BP was as effective as a standard barge-mounted electrofishing unit for capturing species and numbers of individuals. At three low-conductivity lakes, the EF-BP collected fewer species and individuals than a semiportable 5,000-W unit but was more effective than any of the nonelectrofishing gears. Analysis of species accumulation curves for the EF-BP indicated that three or four 4-min electrofishing of transects were sufficient to collect a reasonably complete sample of the available species pool in lakes smaller than 20 ha; in larger lakes up to 900 ha, as many as nine transects were required to achieve a similar degree of sampling sufficiency.

Key concepts: Electrofishing, Minnow, Catch per unit effort, Transect, Backpack, Fishery, Environmental science, Sampling (signal processing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of a Backpack Electrofishing Unit for Multiple Lake Surveys of Fish Assemblage Structure — Research Paper | ScholarLens