Evaluation of a Backpack Electrofishing Unit for Multiple Lake Surveys of Fish Assemblage Structure
Peter D. Vaux, Thomas R. Whittier, Gregory DeCesare, James P. Kurtenbach
Abstract
Peter D. Vaux, Thomas R. Whittier, Gregory DeCesare, James P. Kurtenbach
Abstract
We evaluated the effectiveness of a portable, backpack electrofishing unit, used from a small boat, for sampling fish assemblage structure in 11 lakes in the northeastern United States. Samples collected with a boat-mounted, 350-W backpack unit (EF-BP) were compared with samples taken by (1) two 5,000-W electrofishing units, (2) gill nets, (3) trap nets and minnow traps, and (4) seines. The EF-BP was more effective than the nonelectrofishing gears, capturing a mean of 79% of a lake's documented fish species pool. Gill nets, beach seines, and trap nets captured, on average, about 50% of the species; minnow traps were least efficient. With identical transect times, the EF-BP was as effective as a standard barge-mounted electrofishing unit for capturing species and numbers of individuals. At three low-conductivity lakes, the EF-BP collected fewer species and individuals than a semiportable 5,000-W unit but was more effective than any of the nonelectrofishing gears. Analysis of species accumulation curves for the EF-BP indicated that three or four 4-min electrofishing of transects were sufficient to collect a reasonably complete sample of the available species pool in lakes smaller than 20 ha; in larger lakes up to 900 ha, as many as nine transects were required to achieve a similar degree of sampling sufficiency.
OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We evaluated the effectiveness of a portable, backpack electrofishing unit, used from a small boat, for sampling fish assemblage structure in 11 lakes in the northeastern United States. Samples collected with a boat-mounted, 350-W backpack unit (EF-BP) were compared with samples taken by (1) two 5,000-W electrofishing units, (2) gill nets, (3) trap nets and minnow traps, and (4) seines. The EF-BP was more effective than the nonelectrofishing gears, capturing a mean of 79% of a lake's documented fish species pool. Gill nets, beach seines, and trap nets captured, on average, about 50% of the species; minnow traps were least efficient. With identical transect times, the EF-BP was as effective as a standard barge-mounted electrofishing unit for capturing species and numbers of individuals. At three low-conductivity lakes, the EF-BP collected fewer species and individuals than a semiportable 5,000-W unit but was more effective than any of the nonelectrofishing gears. Analysis of species accumulation curves for the EF-BP indicated that three or four 4-min electrofishing of transects were sufficient to collect a reasonably complete sample of the available species pool in lakes smaller than 20 ha; in larger lakes up to 900 ha, as many as nine transects were required to achieve a similar degree of sampling sufficiency.
Key concepts: Electrofishing, Minnow, Catch per unit effort, Transect, Backpack, Fishery, Environmental science, Sampling (signal processing)