2007North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementRequires access

Effects of Electroshock on Bluegill Feeding and Susceptibility to Predation

David H. Wahl, Lisa M. Einfalt, Sean P. Callahan

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Electrofishing is a common technique used for the collection of freshwater fish. Although acute effects on fish (e.g., injury and mortality) have been examined, indirect behavioral effects (e.g., feeding and susceptibility to predation) have been relatively ignored. In the laboratory, we examined the effects of electroshock on food consumption by two size-classes of bluegills Lepomis macrochirus and on vulnerability to predation for one size-class. In aquaria, juvenile bluegills (47–55 mm) showed reduced feeding for up to 3 h postshock and no effects thereafter; adults (143–157 mm) exhibited reduced feeding for up to 12 h postshock. In 2.5-m-diameter pools, electroshocked bluegills were more vulnerable than control fish to predation by largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides when a predator was introduced immediately after electroshock, but vulnerability did not differ when the predator was introduced at 10 min postshock. We conclude that electrofishing inhibits feeding and increases vulnerability to predation but only for a short time. For bluegill populations, electrofishing can be an effective sampling technique for research and management with minimal negative consequences.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Electrofishing is a common technique used for the collection of freshwater fish. Although acute effects on fish (e.g., injury and mortality) have been examined, indirect behavioral effects (e.g., feeding and susceptibility to predation) have been relatively ignored. In the laboratory, we examined the effects of electroshock on food consumption by two size-classes of bluegills Lepomis macrochirus and on vulnerability to predation for one size-class. In aquaria, juvenile bluegills (47–55 mm) showed reduced feeding for up to 3 h postshock and no effects thereafter; adults (143–157 mm) exhibited reduced feeding for up to 12 h postshock. In 2.5-m-diameter pools, electroshocked bluegills were more vulnerable than control fish to predation by largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides when a predator was introduced immediately after electroshock, but vulnerability did not differ when the predator was introduced at 10 min postshock. We conclude that electrofishing inhibits feeding and increases vulnerability to predation but only for a short time. For bluegill populations, electrofishing can be an effective sampling technique for research and management with minimal negative consequences.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Electrofishing is a common technique used for the collection of freshwater fish. Although acute effects on fish (e.g., injury and mortality) have been examined, indirect behavioral effects (e.g., feeding and susceptibility to predation) have been relatively ignored. In the laboratory, we examined the effects of electroshock on food consumption by two size-classes of bluegills Lepomis macrochirus and on vulnerability to predation for one size-class. In aquaria, juvenile bluegills (47–55 mm) showed reduced feeding for up to 3 h postshock and no effects thereafter; adults (143–157 mm) exhibited reduced feeding for up to 12 h postshock. In 2.5-m-diameter pools, electroshocked bluegills were more vulnerable than control fish to predation by largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides when a predator was introduced immediately after electroshock, but vulnerability did not differ when the predator was introduced at 10 min postshock. We conclude that electrofishing inhibits feeding and increases vulnerability to predation but only for a short time. For bluegill populations, electrofishing can be an effective sampling technique for research and management with minimal negative consequences.

Key concepts: Electrofishing, Micropterus, Predation, Lepomis macrochirus, Biology, Predator, Bass (fish), Juvenile

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Electroshock on Bluegill Feeding and Susceptibility to Predation — Research Paper | ScholarLens