2000ChemotherapyRequires access

Efficacy of Amikacin, Ofloxacin, Pefloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Enoxacin and Fleroxacin in Experimental Left-Sided Pseudomonas aeruginosa Endocarditis

John A. Papadakis, George Samonis, Sofia Maraki, J. Boutsikakis, V. Petrocheilou, George Saroglou

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The efficacies of amikacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin and fleroxacin, each as monotherapy, were evaluated in a rabbit model of induced left-sided Pseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis. Therapy started 48 h after infection and lasted 5 days. All agents were given intramuscularly; amikacin at 7 mg/kg/12 h, and each quinolone at 35 mg/kg/12 h. All animals survived except for 1 of the group that received amikacin, and 2 of the untreated control group. No sterile vegetations were found in the untreated group and the group of fleroxacin, while 3 animals from the amikacin, ofloxacin, and enoxacin groups, and 2 from the ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin groups had sterile vegetations. All agents used significantly reduced the number of CFU per gram of vegetation versus untreated controls. Enoxacin and ciprofloxacin were equipotent and more effective than pefloxacin, ofloxacin and amikacin. Fleroxacin had a weaker activity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The efficacies of amikacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin and fleroxacin, each as monotherapy, were evaluated in a rabbit model of induced left-sided Pseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis. Therapy started 48 h after infection and lasted 5 days. All agents were given intramuscularly; amikacin at 7 mg/kg/12 h, and each quinolone at 35 mg/kg/12 h. All animals survived except for 1 of the group that received amikacin, and 2 of the untreated control group. No sterile vegetations were found in the untreated group and the group of fleroxacin, while 3 animals from the amikacin, ofloxacin, and enoxacin groups, and 2 from the ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin groups had sterile vegetations. All agents used significantly reduced the number of CFU per gram of vegetation versus untreated controls. Enoxacin and ciprofloxacin were equipotent and more effective than pefloxacin, ofloxacin and amikacin. Fleroxacin had a weaker activity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The efficacies of amikacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, enoxacin and fleroxacin, each as monotherapy, were evaluated in a rabbit model of induced left-sided Pseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis. Therapy started 48 h after infection and lasted 5 days. All agents were given intramuscularly; amikacin at 7 mg/kg/12 h, and each quinolone at 35 mg/kg/12 h. All animals survived except for 1 of the group that received amikacin, and 2 of the untreated control group. No sterile vegetations were found in the untreated group and the group of fleroxacin, while 3 animals from the amikacin, ofloxacin, and enoxacin groups, and 2 from the ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin groups had sterile vegetations. All agents used significantly reduced the number of CFU per gram of vegetation versus untreated controls. Enoxacin and ciprofloxacin were equipotent and more effective than pefloxacin, ofloxacin and amikacin. Fleroxacin had a weaker activity.

Key concepts: Pefloxacin, Fleroxacin, Amikacin, Enoxacin, Ofloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Antibacterial agent, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of Amikacin, Ofloxacin, Pefloxacin, Ciprofloxacin, Enoxacin and Fleroxacin in Experimental Left-Sided Pseudomonas aeruginosa Endocarditis — Research Paper | ScholarLens