1981Journal of Histochemistry & CytochemistryOpen access

Fluorescence of yeast vitally stained with ethidium bromide and propidium iodide.

DAVID A. CORLISS, William E. White

Open full text 30 citations

Abstract

Both ethidium bromide and propidium iodide stain growing yeast. As visualized in the fluorescence microscope, ethidium stains the nucleus and cytoplasm in wild type yeast and in those grown in 10% dextrose, with brightly fluorescent cytoplasmic granules being present in both. Under the latter conditions, the mitochondria are repressed but not absent. In rho 0 cells, in which the mitochondrial DNA is absent, ethidium appears to bind to the cell wall or membrane preferentially with no cytoplasmic granules being visible. In all cell types, propidium appears to bind the cell wall or membrane with no cytoplasmic granules being visible in any cell. The staining patterns thus suggest greater differences in the binding of these two types to mitochondrial DNA in situ than is suggested by their in vitro behavior. These differences in binding could explain their different mutagenic capacities..

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Both ethidium bromide and propidium iodide stain growing yeast. As visualized in the fluorescence microscope, ethidium stains the nucleus and cytoplasm in wild type yeast and in those grown in 10% dextrose, with brightly fluorescent cytoplasmic granules being present in both. Under the latter conditions, the mitochondria are repressed but not absent. In rho 0 cells, in which the mitochondrial DNA is absent, ethidium appears to bind to the cell wall or membrane preferentially with no cytoplasmic granules being visible. In all cell types, propidium appears to bind the cell wall or membrane with no cytoplasmic granules being visible in any cell. The staining patterns thus suggest greater differences in the binding of these two types to mitochondrial DNA in situ than is suggested by their in vitro behavior. These differences in binding could explain their different mutagenic capacities..

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Both ethidium bromide and propidium iodide stain growing yeast. As visualized in the fluorescence microscope, ethidium stains the nucleus and cytoplasm in wild type yeast and in those grown in 10% dextrose, with brightly fluorescent cytoplasmic granules being present in both. Under the latter conditions, the mitochondria are repressed but not absent. In rho 0 cells, in which the mitochondrial DNA is absent, ethidium appears to bind to the cell wall or membrane preferentially with no cytoplasmic granules being visible. In all cell types, propidium appears to bind the cell wall or membrane with no cytoplasmic granules being visible in any cell. The staining patterns thus suggest greater differences in the binding of these two types to mitochondrial DNA in situ than is suggested by their in vitro behavior. These differences in binding could explain their different mutagenic capacities..

Key concepts: Ethidium bromide, Propidium iodide, Cytoplasm, Yeast, Biology, Staining, Molecular biology, Fluorescence microscope

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fluorescence of yeast vitally stained with ethidium bromide and propidium iodide. — Research Paper | ScholarLens