2005PubMedRequires access

[Tooth cleaning with different children's toothbrushes. A clinical study].

Nathalie Scheidegger, Adrian Lussi

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Toothbrushing is still the most effective method to maintain healthy conditions for teeth and gingiva. Over the last decades various manual and electric toothbrushes were developed to simplify oral hygiene and to shorten the duration of plaque removal. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two conventional toothbrushes and a three-headed toothbrush. Over a period of eight months 47 schoolchildren, aged between five and nine years, used different toothbrushes (one conventional medium-hard "Pingu", one conventional soft "CuraKid" and the three-headed toothbrush "Superbrush"). The study had a balanced, single blinded cross-over design. The children were assigned to one of two groups balanced with respect to the O'Leary Plaque Index. Following instructions, one group used a conventional brush during two months, the other group the"Superbrush". After two months they changed the brushes. After eight months the children had used all three brushes. The children were instructed to keep their usual oral hygiene habits. At the start and the end of each experimental period, the presence of plaque and gingival inflammation were recorded. A significant improvement of plaque removal and reduction of the gingival inflammation over eight months were noticed for all three brushes (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the cleaning efficiency between the three toothbrushes (P > 0.05). Significant improvements in plaque removal in children can be achieved following good brushing instructions regardless of the toothbrush design used.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Toothbrushing is still the most effective method to maintain healthy conditions for teeth and gingiva. Over the last decades various manual and electric toothbrushes were developed to simplify oral hygiene and to shorten the duration of plaque removal. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two conventional toothbrushes and a three-headed toothbrush. Over a period of eight months 47 schoolchildren, aged between five and nine years, used different toothbrushes (one conventional medium-hard "Pingu", one conventional soft "CuraKid" and the three-headed toothbrush "Superbrush"). The study had a balanced, single blinded cross-over design. The children were assigned to one of two groups balanced with respect to the O'Leary Plaque Index. Following instructions, one group used a conventional brush during two months, the other group the"Superbrush". After two months they changed the brushes. After eight months the children had used all three brushes. The children were instructed to keep their usual oral hygiene habits. At the start and the end of each experimental period, the presence of plaque and gingival inflammation were recorded. A significant improvement of plaque removal and reduction of the gingival inflammation over eight months were noticed for all three brushes (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the cleaning efficiency between the three toothbrushes (P > 0.05). Significant improvements in plaque removal in children can be achieved following good brushing instructions regardless of the toothbrush design used.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Toothbrushing is still the most effective method to maintain healthy conditions for teeth and gingiva. Over the last decades various manual and electric toothbrushes were developed to simplify oral hygiene and to shorten the duration of plaque removal. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two conventional toothbrushes and a three-headed toothbrush. Over a period of eight months 47 schoolchildren, aged between five and nine years, used different toothbrushes (one conventional medium-hard "Pingu", one conventional soft "CuraKid" and the three-headed toothbrush "Superbrush"). The study had a balanced, single blinded cross-over design. The children were assigned to one of two groups balanced with respect to the O'Leary Plaque Index. Following instructions, one group used a conventional brush during two months, the other group the"Superbrush". After two months they changed the brushes. After eight months the children had used all three brushes. The children were instructed to keep their usual oral hygiene habits. At the start and the end of each experimental period, the presence of plaque and gingival inflammation were recorded. A significant improvement of plaque removal and reduction of the gingival inflammation over eight months were noticed for all three brushes (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the cleaning efficiency between the three toothbrushes (P > 0.05). Significant improvements in plaque removal in children can be achieved following good brushing instructions regardless of the toothbrush design used.

Key concepts: Toothbrush, Medicine, Gingival inflammation, Dentistry, Oral hygiene, Dental plaque, Brush, Tooth brushing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Tooth cleaning with different children's toothbrushes. A clinical study]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens