2014Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIERequires access

Comparing digital-light-processing (DLP) and liquid-crystal-on-silicon (LCoS) technologies for high-quality 3D shape measurement

Chen Gong, Beiwen Li, Kevin G. Harding, Song Zhang

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a thorough comparison between the digital-light-processing (DLP) technology and liquid-crystal-onsilicon (LCoS) technology on high-quality 3D shape measurement. Specifically, we will study not only each individual color, but also the combination of different color (i.e., white light). The binary defocusing and focused sinusoidal fringe projection methods will be evaluated under all these scenarios. Experimental data demonstrated that for slow speed measurements, DLP has better fringe contrast and thus higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) for better quality 3D shape measurement when the binary defocusing method is employed, or when proper synchronization is present when the focus sinusoidal method is used; and LCoS provides more flexibility for system development when the focus sinusoidal method is employed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents a thorough comparison between the digital-light-processing (DLP) technology and liquid-crystal-onsilicon (LCoS) technology on high-quality 3D shape measurement. Specifically, we will study not only each individual color, but also the combination of different color (i.e., white light). The binary defocusing and focused sinusoidal fringe projection methods will be evaluated under all these scenarios. Experimental data demonstrated that for slow speed measurements, DLP has better fringe contrast and thus higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) for better quality 3D shape measurement when the binary defocusing method is employed, or when proper synchronization is present when the focus sinusoidal method is used; and LCoS provides more flexibility for system development when the focus sinusoidal method is employed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents a thorough comparison between the digital-light-processing (DLP) technology and liquid-crystal-onsilicon (LCoS) technology on high-quality 3D shape measurement. Specifically, we will study not only each individual color, but also the combination of different color (i.e., white light). The binary defocusing and focused sinusoidal fringe projection methods will be evaluated under all these scenarios. Experimental data demonstrated that for slow speed measurements, DLP has better fringe contrast and thus higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) for better quality 3D shape measurement when the binary defocusing method is employed, or when proper synchronization is present when the focus sinusoidal method is used; and LCoS provides more flexibility for system development when the focus sinusoidal method is employed.

Key concepts: Liquid crystal on silicon, Digital Light Processing, Focus (optics), Computer science, Structured-light 3D scanner, Optics, Liquid-crystal display, Binary number

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparing digital-light-processing (DLP) and liquid-crystal-on-silicon (LCoS) technologies for high-quality 3D shape measurement — Research Paper | ScholarLens