Extravascular lung water following resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock in swine: comparison between Ringers' lactate and normal saline
Christopher J. Phillips, Brandon H. Tieu, Daniel Hagg, Martin A. Schreiber
Abstract
Open-access reader
Christopher J. Phillips, Brandon H. Tieu, Daniel Hagg, Martin A. Schreiber
Abstract
Open-access reader
Pulmonary edema is a common consequence of hemorrhagic shock resuscitation. The type and amount of fluid used in resuscitation may be important determinants of the amount of edema formed. Ringers' lactate (RL) and normal saline (NS) remain common resuscitative fluids. These experiments were designed to measure the extravascular lung water (EVLW) after resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock with RL vs NS, to determine whether the fluid type results in differences in the amount of EVLW, and to determine whether there exists a threshold amount of fluid that results in the development of edema.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Pulmonary edema is a common consequence of hemorrhagic shock resuscitation. The type and amount of fluid used in resuscitation may be important determinants of the amount of edema formed. Ringers' lactate (RL) and normal saline (NS) remain common resuscitative fluids. These experiments were designed to measure the extravascular lung water (EVLW) after resuscitation from hemorrhagic shock with RL vs NS, to determine whether the fluid type results in differences in the amount of EVLW, and to determine whether there exists a threshold amount of fluid that results in the development of edema.
Key concepts: Resuscitation, Medicine, Hemorrhagic shock, Shock (circulatory), Saline, Pulmonary edema, Anesthesia, Edema