2010•Journal of applied science and environmental managementOpen access

Evaluation of Synthetic Outlet Runoff Assessment Models

Arash Adib, Meysam Salarijazi, K Najafpour

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

Quantitative understanding and prediction of the processes of runoff generation and its transmission to the outlet represent one of the most basic and challenging areas of hydrology. Traditional techniques for design flood estimation use historical rainfall-runoff data for unit hydrograph (UH) derivation. Such techniques have been widely applied for the estimation of design flood hydrograph at the sites of gauged catchment. For ungauged catchments, unit hydrograph may be derived using synthetic SCS and Snyder unit hydrograph models. This research has been carried out for comparison of the correctness of SCS and Snyder unit hydrograph models in determination of the shape and dimensions of outlet runoff hydrograph in Kasilian watershed. This watershed has 67.5 km2 area and it locates in Mazandaran province of Iran. The runoff hydrographs computed by the SCS and Snyder models were compared with observed hydrographs by using of three error functions, viz. 1-model efficiency (EFF), 2-percentage error in peak (PEP), and 3-percentage error in time to peak (PETP). The results reveal the accuracy and applicability of these synthetic models for derivation of runoff hydrograph.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Quantitative understanding and prediction of the processes of runoff generation and its transmission to the outlet represent one of the most basic and challenging areas of hydrology. Traditional techniques for design flood estimation use historical rainfall-runoff data for unit hydrograph (UH) derivation. Such techniques have been widely applied for the estimation of design flood hydrograph at the sites of gauged catchment. For ungauged catchments, unit hydrograph may be derived using synthetic SCS and Snyder unit hydrograph models. This research has been carried out for comparison of the correctness of SCS and Snyder unit hydrograph models in determination of the shape and dimensions of outlet runoff hydrograph in Kasilian watershed. This watershed has 67.5 km2 area and it locates in Mazandaran province of Iran. The runoff hydrographs computed by the SCS and Snyder models were compared with observed hydrographs by using of three error functions, viz. 1-model efficiency (EFF), 2-percentage error in peak (PEP), and 3-percentage error in time to peak (PETP). The results reveal the accuracy and applicability of these synthetic models for derivation of runoff hydrograph.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Quantitative understanding and prediction of the processes of runoff generation and its transmission to the outlet represent one of the most basic and challenging areas of hydrology. Traditional techniques for design flood estimation use historical rainfall-runoff data for unit hydrograph (UH) derivation. Such techniques have been widely applied for the estimation of design flood hydrograph at the sites of gauged catchment. For ungauged catchments, unit hydrograph may be derived using synthetic SCS and Snyder unit hydrograph models. This research has been carried out for comparison of the correctness of SCS and Snyder unit hydrograph models in determination of the shape and dimensions of outlet runoff hydrograph in Kasilian watershed. This watershed has 67.5 km2 area and it locates in Mazandaran province of Iran. The runoff hydrographs computed by the SCS and Snyder models were compared with observed hydrographs by using of three error functions, viz. 1-model efficiency (EFF), 2-percentage error in peak (PEP), and 3-percentage error in time to peak (PETP). The results reveal the accuracy and applicability of these synthetic models for derivation of runoff hydrograph.

Key concepts: Hydrograph, Runoff model, Surface runoff, Hydrology (agriculture), Watershed, Flood myth, Environmental science, Runoff curve number

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Synthetic Outlet Runoff Assessment Models — Research Paper | ScholarLens