1990Journal of Geotechnical EngineeringRequires access

Double‐Yield‐Surface Model. II: Implementation and Verification

Ronaldo I. Borja, H. S. Hsieh, Edward Kavazanjian

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

A double‐yield‐surface constitutive model for the stress‐strain‐time behavior of cohesive soils is implemented into a nonlinear finite element program based on Biot's three‐dimensional consolidation theory. The coupled soil deformation‐fluid flow model allows creep effects to be modeled concurrently. The soil's hydraulic conductivity is considered a state variable, which varies with the void ratio so that it decreases as the soil compacts. Parametric, laboratory, and field‐case studies are performed on various cohesive soils such as Weald clay, undisturbed bay mud, and Boston blue clay to validate the model. Numerical simulations include drained, undrained, consolidation, creep, stress‐relaxation, and combined stress‐relaxation and creep tests under triaxial and plane‐strain stress conditions. The constitutive model is shown to predict the stress‐strain‐time behavior of “wet” clays more accurately than did an earlier version based on a single‐yield‐surface criterion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A double‐yield‐surface constitutive model for the stress‐strain‐time behavior of cohesive soils is implemented into a nonlinear finite element program based on Biot's three‐dimensional consolidation theory. The coupled soil deformation‐fluid flow model allows creep effects to be modeled concurrently. The soil's hydraulic conductivity is considered a state variable, which varies with the void ratio so that it decreases as the soil compacts. Parametric, laboratory, and field‐case studies are performed on various cohesive soils such as Weald clay, undisturbed bay mud, and Boston blue clay to validate the model. Numerical simulations include drained, undrained, consolidation, creep, stress‐relaxation, and combined stress‐relaxation and creep tests under triaxial and plane‐strain stress conditions. The constitutive model is shown to predict the stress‐strain‐time behavior of “wet” clays more accurately than did an earlier version based on a single‐yield‐surface criterion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A double‐yield‐surface constitutive model for the stress‐strain‐time behavior of cohesive soils is implemented into a nonlinear finite element program based on Biot's three‐dimensional consolidation theory. The coupled soil deformation‐fluid flow model allows creep effects to be modeled concurrently. The soil's hydraulic conductivity is considered a state variable, which varies with the void ratio so that it decreases as the soil compacts. Parametric, laboratory, and field‐case studies are performed on various cohesive soils such as Weald clay, undisturbed bay mud, and Boston blue clay to validate the model. Numerical simulations include drained, undrained, consolidation, creep, stress‐relaxation, and combined stress‐relaxation and creep tests under triaxial and plane‐strain stress conditions. The constitutive model is shown to predict the stress‐strain‐time behavior of “wet” clays more accurately than did an earlier version based on a single‐yield‐surface criterion.

Key concepts: Biot number, Geotechnical engineering, Consolidation (business), Creep, Constitutive equation, Void ratio, Yield surface, Critical state soil mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Double‐Yield‐Surface Model. II: Implementation and Verification — Research Paper | ScholarLens