2009Blumea - Biodiversity Evolution and Biogeography of PlantsRequires access

How to tackle revisions of large genera: lessons from Macaranga and Mallotus (Euphorbiaceae)

Peter C. van Welzen, K.K.M. Kulju, Soraya Sierra

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

Two approaches to revise large genera are discussed.The first approach can be done by a single person, who revises the genus area after area.The other approach is by a team that revises per infrageneric taxon (preferably a single person per infrageneric group).The two approaches have their positive and negative sides, but both give good results.One problem with both approaches is to keep an overview of a possible infrageneric classification.The latter problem can be tackled by performing phylogenetic analyses based on molecular markers (providing core phylogeny) in combination with morphological, palynological, and anatomical data (providing apomorphies for infrageneric taxa).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two approaches to revise large genera are discussed.The first approach can be done by a single person, who revises the genus area after area.The other approach is by a team that revises per infrageneric taxon (preferably a single person per infrageneric group).The two approaches have their positive and negative sides, but both give good results.One problem with both approaches is to keep an overview of a possible infrageneric classification.The latter problem can be tackled by performing phylogenetic analyses based on molecular markers (providing core phylogeny) in combination with morphological, palynological, and anatomical data (providing apomorphies for infrageneric taxa).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two approaches to revise large genera are discussed.The first approach can be done by a single person, who revises the genus area after area.The other approach is by a team that revises per infrageneric taxon (preferably a single person per infrageneric group).The two approaches have their positive and negative sides, but both give good results.One problem with both approaches is to keep an overview of a possible infrageneric classification.The latter problem can be tackled by performing phylogenetic analyses based on molecular markers (providing core phylogeny) in combination with morphological, palynological, and anatomical data (providing apomorphies for infrageneric taxa).

Key concepts: Biology, Euphorbiaceae, Taxon, Mallotus, Phylogenetic tree, Genus, Phylogenetics, Botany

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How to tackle revisions of large genera: lessons from Macaranga and Mallotus (Euphorbiaceae) — Research Paper | ScholarLens