Slichter modes and Love numbers
David Crossley, Michael G. Rochester, Z. R. Peng
Abstract
Open-access reader
David Crossley, Michael G. Rochester, Z. R. Peng
Abstract
Open-access reader
The recent claim by Smylie [1992] to have detected the Slichter modes of the Earth's inner core rests on what appears to be a remarkable agreement between theory and observation. However the theoretical eigenperiods which are used by Smylie conflict significantly with all previously published periods for the Slichter modes, both for non‐rotating and rotating Earth models. A closer examination of the theory used in these calculations reveals the use of static Love numbers to represent the response of the inner core and mantle to dynamics in the liquid core. We here show that the use of dynamic Love numbers restores the eigenperiods to those obtained using standard seismological theory and consequently destroys agreement between these periods and the claimed observations.
OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The recent claim by Smylie [1992] to have detected the Slichter modes of the Earth's inner core rests on what appears to be a remarkable agreement between theory and observation. However the theoretical eigenperiods which are used by Smylie conflict significantly with all previously published periods for the Slichter modes, both for non‐rotating and rotating Earth models. A closer examination of the theory used in these calculations reveals the use of static Love numbers to represent the response of the inner core and mantle to dynamics in the liquid core. We here show that the use of dynamic Love numbers restores the eigenperiods to those obtained using standard seismological theory and consequently destroys agreement between these periods and the claimed observations.
Key concepts: Inner core, Physics, Outer core, Core (optical fiber), Mantle (geology), Geophysics, Geology, Theoretical physics