1992•Geophysical Research LettersOpen access

Slichter modes and Love numbers

David Crossley, Michael G. Rochester, Z. R. Peng

Open full text 59 citations

Abstract

The recent claim by Smylie [1992] to have detected the Slichter modes of the Earth's inner core rests on what appears to be a remarkable agreement between theory and observation. However the theoretical eigenperiods which are used by Smylie conflict significantly with all previously published periods for the Slichter modes, both for non‐rotating and rotating Earth models. A closer examination of the theory used in these calculations reveals the use of static Love numbers to represent the response of the inner core and mantle to dynamics in the liquid core. We here show that the use of dynamic Love numbers restores the eigenperiods to those obtained using standard seismological theory and consequently destroys agreement between these periods and the claimed observations.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The recent claim by Smylie [1992] to have detected the Slichter modes of the Earth's inner core rests on what appears to be a remarkable agreement between theory and observation. However the theoretical eigenperiods which are used by Smylie conflict significantly with all previously published periods for the Slichter modes, both for non‐rotating and rotating Earth models. A closer examination of the theory used in these calculations reveals the use of static Love numbers to represent the response of the inner core and mantle to dynamics in the liquid core. We here show that the use of dynamic Love numbers restores the eigenperiods to those obtained using standard seismological theory and consequently destroys agreement between these periods and the claimed observations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 59 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The recent claim by Smylie [1992] to have detected the Slichter modes of the Earth's inner core rests on what appears to be a remarkable agreement between theory and observation. However the theoretical eigenperiods which are used by Smylie conflict significantly with all previously published periods for the Slichter modes, both for non‐rotating and rotating Earth models. A closer examination of the theory used in these calculations reveals the use of static Love numbers to represent the response of the inner core and mantle to dynamics in the liquid core. We here show that the use of dynamic Love numbers restores the eigenperiods to those obtained using standard seismological theory and consequently destroys agreement between these periods and the claimed observations.

Key concepts: Inner core, Physics, Outer core, Core (optical fiber), Mantle (geology), Geophysics, Geology, Theoretical physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Slichter modes and Love numbers — Research Paper | ScholarLens