Resistance analysis and object relations theory: Erroneous conceptions amidst some timely contributions.
Fred Busch
Abstract
Fred Busch
Abstract
Although object relations theory has led to important contributions to our understanding of the resistances, object relations theorists consistentIy make a common psychoanalytic error in their understanding of resistances (i.e., the confusion of Freud's first and second theories of anxiety). The implications of this for psychoanalytic technique and the goals of psychoanalytic treatment are explored
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Although object relations theory has led to important contributions to our understanding of the resistances, object relations theorists consistentIy make a common psychoanalytic error in their understanding of resistances (i.e., the confusion of Freud's first and second theories of anxiety). The implications of this for psychoanalytic technique and the goals of psychoanalytic treatment are explored
Key concepts: Psychoanalytic theory, Object relations theory, Psychology, Object (grammar), Resistance (ecology), Psychoanalysis, Confusion, Epistemology