2001•Journal of American HistoryRequires access

Peaceful Revolution: Constitutional Change and American Culture from Progressivism to the New Deal

Norman L. Rosenberg, Maxwell H. Bloomfield

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Peaceful Revolution links two scholarly projects that have recently received increased attention in legalconstitutional studies: understanding the dynamics of constitutional change and mapping the cultural domain of constitutionalism. In contrast to other recent studies such as Robert Lipkin's Constitutional Revolutions (2000) and Paul Kahn's The Cultural Study of Law (1999), this slim volume avoids extensive theoretical discussion. For better or for worse, it largely ignores the voluminous literature coming from fields such as critical cultural studies of law and law and literature. Instead, Maxwell Bloomfield's book embraces a fairly traditional approach to works of popular culture (novels, plays, motion pictures, cartoons, and newspapers) in order to highlight the way in which they provided “cultural foundations” of “the ‘constitutional revolution’ of the 1930s.” Popular materials provide “an important imaginative dimension to constitutional discourse” and show that Americans “share a strong rights consciousness and a faith in the constitutional process as a peaceful remedy for even the most divisive political controversies.” Although works of popular culture “do not generally originate proposals for constitutional change at the national level,” they do “interpret important issues in terms that will be meaningful for their respective audiences.” Thus, the debate over constitutional change that took place from the Progressive Era to the inauguration of Franklin D. Roosevelt was located not simply in court decisions, law reviews, and legal treatises but in novels such as Edward Mandell House's Philip Dru (1912) and silent films such as Votesfor Women (1912), in which Jane Addams made her movie debut. In response to Woodrow Wilson's “war socialism,” the popular constitutional culture of the 1920s, this study argues, urged a “kind of constitutional counterrevolution” in which the power of the national government was to be reined in dramatically. Works as diverse as Arthur Train's novel The Needle's Eye (1924), James M. Beck's popular history The Constitution of the United States (1924), and Harold Gray's Little Orphan Annie comic strip all preached, albeit in different ways, the cause of limited constitutional government. With the economic collapse of the late 1920s and early 1930s, however, radical works such as the Elmer Rice play We , the People (1933) and the Paramount Pictures film The Phantom President (1932) challenged the “constitutional conservatism” that had dominated the popular constitutional imagination during the twenties.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Peaceful Revolution links two scholarly projects that have recently received increased attention in legalconstitutional studies: understanding the dynamics of constitutional change and mapping the cultural domain of constitutionalism. In contrast to other recent studies such as Robert Lipkin's Constitutional Revolutions (2000) and Paul Kahn's The Cultural Study of Law (1999), this slim volume avoids extensive theoretical discussion. For better or for worse, it largely ignores the voluminous literature coming from fields such as critical cultural studies of law and law and literature. Instead, Maxwell Bloomfield's book embraces a fairly traditional approach to works of popular culture (novels, plays, motion pictures, cartoons, and newspapers) in order to highlight the way in which they provided “cultural foundations” of “the ‘constitutional revolution’ of the 1930s.” Popular materials provide “an important imaginative dimension to constitutional discourse” and show that Americans “share a strong rights consciousness and a faith in the constitutional process as a peaceful remedy for even the most divisive political controversies.” Although works of popular culture “do not generally originate proposals for constitutional change at the national level,” they do “interpret important issues in terms that will be meaningful for their respective audiences.” Thus, the debate over constitutional change that took place from the Progressive Era to the inauguration of Franklin D. Roosevelt was located not simply in court decisions, law reviews, and legal treatises but in novels such as Edward Mandell House's Philip Dru (1912) and silent films such as Votesfor Women (1912), in which Jane Addams made her movie debut. In response to Woodrow Wilson's “war socialism,” the popular constitutional culture of the 1920s, this study argues, urged a “kind of constitutional counterrevolution” in which the power of the national government was to be reined in dramatically. Works as diverse as Arthur Train's novel The Needle's Eye (1924), James M. Beck's popular history The Constitution of the United States (1924), and Harold Gray's Little Orphan Annie comic strip all preached, albeit in different ways, the cause of limited constitutional government. With the economic collapse of the late 1920s and early 1930s, however, radical works such as the Elmer Rice play We , the People (1933) and the Paramount Pictures film The Phantom President (1932) challenged the “constitutional conservatism” that had dominated the popular constitutional imagination during the twenties.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Peaceful Revolution links two scholarly projects that have recently received increased attention in legalconstitutional studies: understanding the dynamics of constitutional change and mapping the cultural domain of constitutionalism. In contrast to other recent studies such as Robert Lipkin's Constitutional Revolutions (2000) and Paul Kahn's The Cultural Study of Law (1999), this slim volume avoids extensive theoretical discussion. For better or for worse, it largely ignores the voluminous literature coming from fields such as critical cultural studies of law and law and literature. Instead, Maxwell Bloomfield's book embraces a fairly traditional approach to works of popular culture (novels, plays, motion pictures, cartoons, and newspapers) in order to highlight the way in which they provided “cultural foundations” of “the ‘constitutional revolution’ of the 1930s.” Popular materials provide “an important imaginative dimension to constitutional discourse” and show that Americans “share a strong rights consciousness and a faith in the constitutional process as a peaceful remedy for even the most divisive political controversies.” Although works of popular culture “do not generally originate proposals for constitutional change at the national level,” they do “interpret important issues in terms that will be meaningful for their respective audiences.” Thus, the debate over constitutional change that took place from the Progressive Era to the inauguration of Franklin D. Roosevelt was located not simply in court decisions, law reviews, and legal treatises but in novels such as Edward Mandell House's Philip Dru (1912) and silent films such as Votesfor Women (1912), in which Jane Addams made her movie debut. In response to Woodrow Wilson's “war socialism,” the popular constitutional culture of the 1920s, this study argues, urged a “kind of constitutional counterrevolution” in which the power of the national government was to be reined in dramatically. Works as diverse as Arthur Train's novel The Needle's Eye (1924), James M. Beck's popular history The Constitution of the United States (1924), and Harold Gray's Little Orphan Annie comic strip all preached, albeit in different ways, the cause of limited constitutional government. With the economic collapse of the late 1920s and early 1930s, however, radical works such as the Elmer Rice play We , the People (1933) and the Paramount Pictures film The Phantom President (1932) challenged the “constitutional conservatism” that had dominated the popular constitutional imagination during the twenties.

Key concepts: Progressivism, Classics, American history, Political science, History, Law, Media studies, Economic history

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Peaceful Revolution: Constitutional Change and American Culture from Progressivism to the New Deal — Research Paper | ScholarLens