HORIZONTALISM, STRUCTURALISM, LIQUIDITY PREFERENCE AND THE PRINCIPLE OF INCREASING RISK
Marc Lavoie
Abstract
Marc Lavoie
Abstract
A bstract It is shown that the horizontal post‐Keynesian view of credit‐money endogeneity is reasonable rather than extreme. One can argue in favour of a horizontal credit‐money supply curve while still taking into account the non‐accommodating behaviour of the central bank, financial innovations, protfolio adjustments, liquidity perference theory, and the principle of increasing risk. The differences between horizontalists and other post‐Keynesian monetary theorists are matters of emphasis rather than substantial differences of opinion. The only real topic of contention is the ultimate determinant of the base rate of interest.
OpenAlex reports 172 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A bstract It is shown that the horizontal post‐Keynesian view of credit‐money endogeneity is reasonable rather than extreme. One can argue in favour of a horizontal credit‐money supply curve while still taking into account the non‐accommodating behaviour of the central bank, financial innovations, protfolio adjustments, liquidity perference theory, and the principle of increasing risk. The differences between horizontalists and other post‐Keynesian monetary theorists are matters of emphasis rather than substantial differences of opinion. The only real topic of contention is the ultimate determinant of the base rate of interest.
Key concepts: Liquidity preference, Economics, Endogeneity, Preference, Market liquidity, Keynesian economics, New Keynesian economics, Monetary economics