1984Grass and Forage ScienceRequires access

The winter hardiness of Festuca rubra, Holcus lanatus and Agrostis spp. in comparison with Lolium perenne

Philip Jones, Alec Charles

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Preliminary experiments were conducted to assess the winter hardiness of representative cultivars or populations of Festuca rubra, Holcus lanatus and Agrostis spp. in comparison with a hardy (Premo) and a susceptible (Grasslands Ruanui) cultivar of Lolium perenne. Two controlled‐environment tests and a field experiment including two cutting and two fertilizer managements are reported. Grasslands Ruanui andH lanatus suffered most damage in all tests. In the controlled‐environment experiments, Premo was at least as hardy as the F. rubra and Agrostis cultivars but in the field Premo was more susceptible. Spring growth of Premo was affected more by the cutting and fertilizer managements applied the previous summer and autumn than was spring growth of F. rubra or Agrostis spp. It was concluded that, whereas use off. F. rubra or Agrostis spp. should not be limited by fears of winter damage, poor winter hardiness may limit the value of H. lanatus for hill and upland reseeding.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Preliminary experiments were conducted to assess the winter hardiness of representative cultivars or populations of Festuca rubra, Holcus lanatus and Agrostis spp. in comparison with a hardy (Premo) and a susceptible (Grasslands Ruanui) cultivar of Lolium perenne. Two controlled‐environment tests and a field experiment including two cutting and two fertilizer managements are reported. Grasslands Ruanui andH lanatus suffered most damage in all tests. In the controlled‐environment experiments, Premo was at least as hardy as the F. rubra and Agrostis cultivars but in the field Premo was more susceptible. Spring growth of Premo was affected more by the cutting and fertilizer managements applied the previous summer and autumn than was spring growth of F. rubra or Agrostis spp. It was concluded that, whereas use off. F. rubra or Agrostis spp. should not be limited by fears of winter damage, poor winter hardiness may limit the value of H. lanatus for hill and upland reseeding.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Preliminary experiments were conducted to assess the winter hardiness of representative cultivars or populations of Festuca rubra, Holcus lanatus and Agrostis spp. in comparison with a hardy (Premo) and a susceptible (Grasslands Ruanui) cultivar of Lolium perenne. Two controlled‐environment tests and a field experiment including two cutting and two fertilizer managements are reported. Grasslands Ruanui andH lanatus suffered most damage in all tests. In the controlled‐environment experiments, Premo was at least as hardy as the F. rubra and Agrostis cultivars but in the field Premo was more susceptible. Spring growth of Premo was affected more by the cutting and fertilizer managements applied the previous summer and autumn than was spring growth of F. rubra or Agrostis spp. It was concluded that, whereas use off. F. rubra or Agrostis spp. should not be limited by fears of winter damage, poor winter hardiness may limit the value of H. lanatus for hill and upland reseeding.

Key concepts: Holcus lanatus, Agrostis, Festuca rubra, Lolium perenne, Hardiness (plants), Biology, Agronomy, Cultivar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The winter hardiness of Festuca rubra, Holcus lanatus and Agrostis spp. in comparison with Lolium perenne — Research Paper | ScholarLens