1997Electronics LettersRequires access

Mutually clock-controlled cipher keystreamgenerators

W.G. Chambers, Simon J. Shepherd

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Two keystream generators are described that use mutual clock control between a number of sequence generators. One is the T52e cipher, and the other uses three linear feedback shift registers. In the latter the register periods can lock together, giving an anomalously short period. Methods for avoiding this are described.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two keystream generators are described that use mutual clock control between a number of sequence generators. One is the T52e cipher, and the other uses three linear feedback shift registers. In the latter the register periods can lock together, giving an anomalously short period. Methods for avoiding this are described.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two keystream generators are described that use mutual clock control between a number of sequence generators. One is the T52e cipher, and the other uses three linear feedback shift registers. In the latter the register periods can lock together, giving an anomalously short period. Methods for avoiding this are described.

Key concepts: Keystream, Stream cipher, Cipher, Shift register, Running key cipher, Computer science, Linear feedback shift register, Lock (firearm)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mutually clock-controlled cipher keystreamgenerators — Research Paper | ScholarLens