1992North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementRequires access

Comparison of Catches in Mono- and Multifilament Gill Nets in Lake Erie

Bryan A. Henderson, Stephen J. Nepszy

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the number, age, sex, and size offish caught in mono- and multifilament gill nets used to assess populations in Lake Erie, The results of this study could be used to adjust estimates of catch per unit of effort if there were a change from multifilament to monofilament gill nets. More yellow perch Perca flavescens (ratio of catches in mono- and multifilament gill nets = 2.04/1), white bass Morone chrysops (2.78/1), white perch Morone americana (2.07/1), freshwater drums Aplodinotus grunniens (2.93/1), walleyes Stizostedion vitreum (1.92/1), and white suckers Catostomus commersoni (1.23/1) were caught in monofilament gill nets. Only rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax and silver chub Macrhybopsis storeriana were more catchable in multifilament nets. There was some evidence that white perch and freshwater drum saturate monofilament gill nets more than multifilament nets. Age, size, and gender compositions of the catches were similar for both gears. Previously, catches in multifilament nets were compared with monofilament catches by applying a ratio of catches in the two gears. Before making these adjustments, one should ensure first that the ratio is statistically significant, and second that the catches of individual species are not affected by other species saturating the gear.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to compare the number, age, sex, and size offish caught in mono- and multifilament gill nets used to assess populations in Lake Erie, The results of this study could be used to adjust estimates of catch per unit of effort if there were a change from multifilament to monofilament gill nets. More yellow perch Perca flavescens (ratio of catches in mono- and multifilament gill nets = 2.04/1), white bass Morone chrysops (2.78/1), white perch Morone americana (2.07/1), freshwater drums Aplodinotus grunniens (2.93/1), walleyes Stizostedion vitreum (1.92/1), and white suckers Catostomus commersoni (1.23/1) were caught in monofilament gill nets. Only rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax and silver chub Macrhybopsis storeriana were more catchable in multifilament nets. There was some evidence that white perch and freshwater drum saturate monofilament gill nets more than multifilament nets. Age, size, and gender compositions of the catches were similar for both gears. Previously, catches in multifilament nets were compared with monofilament catches by applying a ratio of catches in the two gears. Before making these adjustments, one should ensure first that the ratio is statistically significant, and second that the catches of individual species are not affected by other species saturating the gear.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the number, age, sex, and size offish caught in mono- and multifilament gill nets used to assess populations in Lake Erie, The results of this study could be used to adjust estimates of catch per unit of effort if there were a change from multifilament to monofilament gill nets. More yellow perch Perca flavescens (ratio of catches in mono- and multifilament gill nets = 2.04/1), white bass Morone chrysops (2.78/1), white perch Morone americana (2.07/1), freshwater drums Aplodinotus grunniens (2.93/1), walleyes Stizostedion vitreum (1.92/1), and white suckers Catostomus commersoni (1.23/1) were caught in monofilament gill nets. Only rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax and silver chub Macrhybopsis storeriana were more catchable in multifilament nets. There was some evidence that white perch and freshwater drum saturate monofilament gill nets more than multifilament nets. Age, size, and gender compositions of the catches were similar for both gears. Previously, catches in multifilament nets were compared with monofilament catches by applying a ratio of catches in the two gears. Before making these adjustments, one should ensure first that the ratio is statistically significant, and second that the catches of individual species are not affected by other species saturating the gear.

Key concepts: Stizostedion, Perch, Fishery, Catch per unit effort, Biology, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Bass (fish)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Catches in Mono- and Multifilament Gill Nets in Lake Erie — Research Paper | ScholarLens