2000Aquaculture ResearchRequires access

Does the AquasmartTM feeding system reduce sea louse [Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer)] infestation on farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in winter?

Alastair Robert Lyndon, Jason Peter Graham Toovey

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Infections of sea lice [Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer)] were studied over winter on a working, commercial salmon farm in relation to two types of feeding system: a regular, pneumatic spray feeder and an irregular, ‘demand feed’ sensor system (AquasmartTM). Contrary to prediction, the AquasmartTM system alone had no significant effect on chalimus infestation compared with fish fed by pneumatic spray. However, it was associated with significantly reduced numbers of mobile stages, both at the beginning of the study (P < 0.05) and, more particularly, in conjunction with treatment of all pens using hydrogen peroxide (P < 0.001). It is suggested that feeding regime may represent a useful tool in reducing lice infestation when co-ordinated with other methods of control, such as peroxide treatment, and that further work in this field is merited.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Infections of sea lice [Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer)] were studied over winter on a working, commercial salmon farm in relation to two types of feeding system: a regular, pneumatic spray feeder and an irregular, ‘demand feed’ sensor system (AquasmartTM). Contrary to prediction, the AquasmartTM system alone had no significant effect on chalimus infestation compared with fish fed by pneumatic spray. However, it was associated with significantly reduced numbers of mobile stages, both at the beginning of the study (P < 0.05) and, more particularly, in conjunction with treatment of all pens using hydrogen peroxide (P < 0.001). It is suggested that feeding regime may represent a useful tool in reducing lice infestation when co-ordinated with other methods of control, such as peroxide treatment, and that further work in this field is merited.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Infections of sea lice [Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer)] were studied over winter on a working, commercial salmon farm in relation to two types of feeding system: a regular, pneumatic spray feeder and an irregular, ‘demand feed’ sensor system (AquasmartTM). Contrary to prediction, the AquasmartTM system alone had no significant effect on chalimus infestation compared with fish fed by pneumatic spray. However, it was associated with significantly reduced numbers of mobile stages, both at the beginning of the study (P < 0.05) and, more particularly, in conjunction with treatment of all pens using hydrogen peroxide (P < 0.001). It is suggested that feeding regime may represent a useful tool in reducing lice infestation when co-ordinated with other methods of control, such as peroxide treatment, and that further work in this field is merited.

Key concepts: Lepeophtheirus, Salmo, Biology, Infestation, Fishery, Biofouling, Larva, Fish <Actinopterygii>

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does the AquasmartTM feeding system reduce sea louse [Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer)] infestation on farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in winter? — Research Paper | ScholarLens