Chemistry of Atmospheric Deposition, the Snowpack, and Snowmelt in the Turkey Lakes Watershed
R. G. Semkin, D. S. Jeffries
Abstract
R. G. Semkin, D. S. Jeffries
Abstract
Bulk and wet-only deposition and the snowpack were monitored at the Turkey Lakes Watershed in northern Ontario over the winter and spring of 1986. Based on a comparison with snowpack and cumulative snowmelt, the bulk sampler overcollected major ions by factors ranging from 6 to 22%. Nitrate appeared to be preferentially collected by the bulk sampler relative to SO42− during snow events. Dry deposition was estimated to be 12 and 5% of total deposition forSO42− and NO3−, respectively. Ion budgets for cumulative bulk deposition and snowmelt supported the hypothesis that ion losses from the snowpack are insignificant during a winter having no melt episodes. Snowmelt was characterized by chemical fractionation of major ions; SO42− and H+ in initial meltwaters were 10 times more concentrated than the premelt snowpack. Preferential elution of ions in the snowmelt followed the sequence: SO42− > NO3− > H+ > Cl−. Snowmelt chemistry was used to predict changes in lake chemistry: H+, NO3−, and NH4+ levels should increase in lake waters; Ca2+ decreases through dilution by snowmelt; SO42− concentrations remain fairly constant.
OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Bulk and wet-only deposition and the snowpack were monitored at the Turkey Lakes Watershed in northern Ontario over the winter and spring of 1986. Based on a comparison with snowpack and cumulative snowmelt, the bulk sampler overcollected major ions by factors ranging from 6 to 22%. Nitrate appeared to be preferentially collected by the bulk sampler relative to SO42− during snow events. Dry deposition was estimated to be 12 and 5% of total deposition forSO42− and NO3−, respectively. Ion budgets for cumulative bulk deposition and snowmelt supported the hypothesis that ion losses from the snowpack are insignificant during a winter having no melt episodes. Snowmelt was characterized by chemical fractionation of major ions; SO42− and H+ in initial meltwaters were 10 times more concentrated than the premelt snowpack. Preferential elution of ions in the snowmelt followed the sequence: SO42− > NO3− > H+ > Cl−. Snowmelt chemistry was used to predict changes in lake chemistry: H+, NO3−, and NH4+ levels should increase in lake waters; Ca2+ decreases through dilution by snowmelt; SO42− concentrations remain fairly constant.
Key concepts: Snowmelt, Snowpack, Snow, Deposition (geology), Environmental chemistry, Chemistry, Nitrate, Dilution