2011•Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental EngineeringRequires access

Compacted Soil Liner Interface Strength Importance

Timothy D. Stark, Hangseok Choi, Chulho Lee, Brian H. Queen

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

This paper describes an interesting slope failure in a liner system of a municipal solid waste containment facility during construction because the sliding interface is not the geomembrane (GM)/compacted low-permeability soil liner (LPSL) but a soil–soil interface within the LPSL. Some of the lessons learned are as follows: (1) compaction of the LPSL should ensure that each lift is kneaded into the lower lift so a weak interface is not created in the LPSL; (2) the LPSL moisture content should be controlled so it does not exceed the specified value, for example 3–4% wet of optimum, because it can lead to a weak interface in the LPSL; (3) drainage material should be placed over the GM from the slope toe to the top to reduce the shear stresses applied to the weakest interface; and (4) equipment should not move laterally across the slope if it is unsupported but up the slope while placing the cover soil from bottom to top.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes an interesting slope failure in a liner system of a municipal solid waste containment facility during construction because the sliding interface is not the geomembrane (GM)/compacted low-permeability soil liner (LPSL) but a soil–soil interface within the LPSL. Some of the lessons learned are as follows: (1) compaction of the LPSL should ensure that each lift is kneaded into the lower lift so a weak interface is not created in the LPSL; (2) the LPSL moisture content should be controlled so it does not exceed the specified value, for example 3–4% wet of optimum, because it can lead to a weak interface in the LPSL; (3) drainage material should be placed over the GM from the slope toe to the top to reduce the shear stresses applied to the weakest interface; and (4) equipment should not move laterally across the slope if it is unsupported but up the slope while placing the cover soil from bottom to top.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes an interesting slope failure in a liner system of a municipal solid waste containment facility during construction because the sliding interface is not the geomembrane (GM)/compacted low-permeability soil liner (LPSL) but a soil–soil interface within the LPSL. Some of the lessons learned are as follows: (1) compaction of the LPSL should ensure that each lift is kneaded into the lower lift so a weak interface is not created in the LPSL; (2) the LPSL moisture content should be controlled so it does not exceed the specified value, for example 3–4% wet of optimum, because it can lead to a weak interface in the LPSL; (3) drainage material should be placed over the GM from the slope toe to the top to reduce the shear stresses applied to the weakest interface; and (4) equipment should not move laterally across the slope if it is unsupported but up the slope while placing the cover soil from bottom to top.

Key concepts: Geomembrane, Geotechnical engineering, Compaction, Water content, Lift (data mining), Drainage, Interface (matter), Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Compacted Soil Liner Interface Strength Importance — Research Paper | ScholarLens