Comparison of Ranitidine and Sucralfate in the Long-term Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer
Giorgio Masoero, Fatima Rocchia, A. Rossanino, Maria Carolina Marchetto, V. Benitti, Marco De La Pierre
Abstract
Giorgio Masoero, Fatima Rocchia, A. Rossanino, Maria Carolina Marchetto, V. Benitti, Marco De La Pierre
Abstract
We evaluated long-term treatment with either ranitidine (R) or sucralfate (S) in the prevention of duodenal ulcer recurrences. Fifty-nine patients with healed ulcers were randomly allocated to maintenance treatment with 150 mg R nightly or 2 g/day S. By using a life table analysis, the calculated probable remission rates at 4, 8, and 12 months were 90, 85, and 53% with R, respectively, and 62, 62, and 53% with S, respectively. These differences were not significant at any interval. In both groups ulcer relapse was independent of sex, smoking habit, and alcohol and coffee consumption, whereas a history longer than 5 years was significantly related to a higher probability of recurrence. No relevant clinical or biochemical side effects were encountered with either drug, but compliance rate was higher in the R group. R and S are equally effective in preventing duodenal ulcer relapse over a 1-year period of maintenance treatment, although R proved to be more effective in preventing early relapse.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We evaluated long-term treatment with either ranitidine (R) or sucralfate (S) in the prevention of duodenal ulcer recurrences. Fifty-nine patients with healed ulcers were randomly allocated to maintenance treatment with 150 mg R nightly or 2 g/day S. By using a life table analysis, the calculated probable remission rates at 4, 8, and 12 months were 90, 85, and 53% with R, respectively, and 62, 62, and 53% with S, respectively. These differences were not significant at any interval. In both groups ulcer relapse was independent of sex, smoking habit, and alcohol and coffee consumption, whereas a history longer than 5 years was significantly related to a higher probability of recurrence. No relevant clinical or biochemical side effects were encountered with either drug, but compliance rate was higher in the R group. R and S are equally effective in preventing duodenal ulcer relapse over a 1-year period of maintenance treatment, although R proved to be more effective in preventing early relapse.
Key concepts: Medicine, Ranitidine, Sucralfate, Duodenal ulcer, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine, Cimetidine, Duodenum