1988Australian and New Zealand Journal of MedicineRequires access

DIABETIC AMYOTROPHY: REASSESSMENT OF THE CLINICAL SPECTRUM

Peter J. Leedman, Stephen M. Davis, Leonard C. Harrison

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

Diabetic amyotrophy is a syndrome whose recognition may be difficult or delayed. We reviewed thirteen patients with this disorder, all of whom had significant proximal lower limb wasting and weakness as the predominant feature and eleven of whom had pain in the affected limbs. Significant weight loss was common. In nine patients the deficits were largely or totally reversible. Important variations from the classical features were observed. Only five patients displayed asymmetric proximal lower limb wasting, weakness and pain, motor deficits in the remainder being either unilateral or bilateral and symmetrical. The shoulder girdle and arms were also involved in two patients. Proximal limb pain was not invariable, a distal sensory peripheral neuropathy was common, and diabetic control at diagnosis was likely to be good. No prognostic factors were identified. Thus, not all patients with diabetic amyotrophy exhibit the classically-described features. Other than careful clinical examination, a thorough bilateral electromyographic and nerve conduction study remains the most helpful diagnostic test. Appreciation of the clinical spectrum and context of diabetic amyotrophy should facilitate its differentiation from other disorders, including other forms of diabetic neuropathy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Diabetic amyotrophy is a syndrome whose recognition may be difficult or delayed. We reviewed thirteen patients with this disorder, all of whom had significant proximal lower limb wasting and weakness as the predominant feature and eleven of whom had pain in the affected limbs. Significant weight loss was common. In nine patients the deficits were largely or totally reversible. Important variations from the classical features were observed. Only five patients displayed asymmetric proximal lower limb wasting, weakness and pain, motor deficits in the remainder being either unilateral or bilateral and symmetrical. The shoulder girdle and arms were also involved in two patients. Proximal limb pain was not invariable, a distal sensory peripheral neuropathy was common, and diabetic control at diagnosis was likely to be good. No prognostic factors were identified. Thus, not all patients with diabetic amyotrophy exhibit the classically-described features. Other than careful clinical examination, a thorough bilateral electromyographic and nerve conduction study remains the most helpful diagnostic test. Appreciation of the clinical spectrum and context of diabetic amyotrophy should facilitate its differentiation from other disorders, including other forms of diabetic neuropathy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Diabetic amyotrophy is a syndrome whose recognition may be difficult or delayed. We reviewed thirteen patients with this disorder, all of whom had significant proximal lower limb wasting and weakness as the predominant feature and eleven of whom had pain in the affected limbs. Significant weight loss was common. In nine patients the deficits were largely or totally reversible. Important variations from the classical features were observed. Only five patients displayed asymmetric proximal lower limb wasting, weakness and pain, motor deficits in the remainder being either unilateral or bilateral and symmetrical. The shoulder girdle and arms were also involved in two patients. Proximal limb pain was not invariable, a distal sensory peripheral neuropathy was common, and diabetic control at diagnosis was likely to be good. No prognostic factors were identified. Thus, not all patients with diabetic amyotrophy exhibit the classically-described features. Other than careful clinical examination, a thorough bilateral electromyographic and nerve conduction study remains the most helpful diagnostic test. Appreciation of the clinical spectrum and context of diabetic amyotrophy should facilitate its differentiation from other disorders, including other forms of diabetic neuropathy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Amyotrophy, Weakness, Wasting, Context (archaeology), Diabetic neuropathy, Peripheral neuropathy, Shoulder girdle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DIABETIC AMYOTROPHY: REASSESSMENT OF THE CLINICAL SPECTRUM — Research Paper | ScholarLens