2006Journal of Cognition and CultureOpen access

On Folk Conceptions of Mind, Agency and Morality

Paulo Sousa

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

On Folk Conceptions of Mind, Agency and Morality* P S** Folk conceptions of mind comprise, among other things, concepts of dispositional traits like generosity, stubbornness and wickedness, concepts of propositional attitudes like beliefs, desires and intentions, concepts of emotions like anger, guilt and love, and concepts of mental actions such as choices and decisions.In addition to concepts of mental actions, folk conceptions of agency comprise concepts of behavioral actions, and classifications of types of both behavioral and mental actions -intentional versus unintentional action, free versus non-free action, and free choice versus non-free choice.Folk conceptions of morality comprise, among other things, concepts of norms and obligations, concepts of responsibility, such as blameworthiness or praiseworthiness, and concepts of vices and virtues. 1 There are many apparent connections between these folk conceptions.The classification of different types of observable behaviors may depend on their mental etiology.A basic notion of action may be part of the folk concept of obligation, if one considers such a concept as a one-place predicate with a placeholder for action (e.g., Jackendoff, 1999).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On Folk Conceptions of Mind, Agency and Morality* P S** Folk conceptions of mind comprise, among other things, concepts of dispositional traits like generosity, stubbornness and wickedness, concepts of propositional attitudes like beliefs, desires and intentions, concepts of emotions like anger, guilt and love, and concepts of mental actions such as choices and decisions.In addition to concepts of mental actions, folk conceptions of agency comprise concepts of behavioral actions, and classifications of types of both behavioral and mental actions -intentional versus unintentional action, free versus non-free action, and free choice versus non-free choice.Folk conceptions of morality comprise, among other things, concepts of norms and obligations, concepts of responsibility, such as blameworthiness or praiseworthiness, and concepts of vices and virtues. 1 There are many apparent connections between these folk conceptions.The classification of different types of observable behaviors may depend on their mental etiology.A basic notion of action may be part of the folk concept of obligation, if one considers such a concept as a one-place predicate with a placeholder for action (e.g., Jackendoff, 1999).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On Folk Conceptions of Mind, Agency and Morality* P S** Folk conceptions of mind comprise, among other things, concepts of dispositional traits like generosity, stubbornness and wickedness, concepts of propositional attitudes like beliefs, desires and intentions, concepts of emotions like anger, guilt and love, and concepts of mental actions such as choices and decisions.In addition to concepts of mental actions, folk conceptions of agency comprise concepts of behavioral actions, and classifications of types of both behavioral and mental actions -intentional versus unintentional action, free versus non-free action, and free choice versus non-free choice.Folk conceptions of morality comprise, among other things, concepts of norms and obligations, concepts of responsibility, such as blameworthiness or praiseworthiness, and concepts of vices and virtues. 1 There are many apparent connections between these folk conceptions.The classification of different types of observable behaviors may depend on their mental etiology.A basic notion of action may be part of the folk concept of obligation, if one considers such a concept as a one-place predicate with a placeholder for action (e.g., Jackendoff, 1999).

Key concepts: Philosophy of mind, Morality, Agency (philosophy), Moral agency, Folk psychology, Philosophy of language, Epistemology, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Folk Conceptions of Mind, Agency and Morality — Research Paper | ScholarLens