2002•Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual DisabilitiesRequires access

Identity Conflict in People with Intellectual Disabilities: What Role do Service-providers Play in Mediating Stigma?

Jaime Craig, Fiona Craig, Paul Withers, Chris Hatton, Kate Limb

Open publisher page 118 citations

Abstract

Background Self-restraint often appears to be associated with self-injurious behaviour (SIB), and has been described as an attempt to prevent or escape from SIB. Research into the determinants of self-restraint is limited, and the present single case study assesses the environmental determinants of self-restraint and SIB, as well as describing the relationship between the two behaviours. Methods Observations in the natural environment were conducted for 16.5h and data were collected on SIB, self-restraint and environmental events. Results Sequential analysis showed that SIB and self-restraint were unrelated to environmental events and that the behaviours co-varied inversely. Self-injurious behaviour occurred at higher than chance levels immediately following self-restraint and also at high levels immediately prior to self-restraint. Conclusions Whilst these results would appear to support the hypothesis that self-restraint was negatively reinforced by escape from SIB, the data cannot be explained solely by this theory. The implications of these findings for the behavioural theory of SIB and the conceptualization of self-restraint are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background Self-restraint often appears to be associated with self-injurious behaviour (SIB), and has been described as an attempt to prevent or escape from SIB. Research into the determinants of self-restraint is limited, and the present single case study assesses the environmental determinants of self-restraint and SIB, as well as describing the relationship between the two behaviours. Methods Observations in the natural environment were conducted for 16.5h and data were collected on SIB, self-restraint and environmental events. Results Sequential analysis showed that SIB and self-restraint were unrelated to environmental events and that the behaviours co-varied inversely. Self-injurious behaviour occurred at higher than chance levels immediately following self-restraint and also at high levels immediately prior to self-restraint. Conclusions Whilst these results would appear to support the hypothesis that self-restraint was negatively reinforced by escape from SIB, the data cannot be explained solely by this theory. The implications of these findings for the behavioural theory of SIB and the conceptualization of self-restraint are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 118 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background Self-restraint often appears to be associated with self-injurious behaviour (SIB), and has been described as an attempt to prevent or escape from SIB. Research into the determinants of self-restraint is limited, and the present single case study assesses the environmental determinants of self-restraint and SIB, as well as describing the relationship between the two behaviours. Methods Observations in the natural environment were conducted for 16.5h and data were collected on SIB, self-restraint and environmental events. Results Sequential analysis showed that SIB and self-restraint were unrelated to environmental events and that the behaviours co-varied inversely. Self-injurious behaviour occurred at higher than chance levels immediately following self-restraint and also at high levels immediately prior to self-restraint. Conclusions Whilst these results would appear to support the hypothesis that self-restraint was negatively reinforced by escape from SIB, the data cannot be explained solely by this theory. The implications of these findings for the behavioural theory of SIB and the conceptualization of self-restraint are discussed.

Key concepts: Psychology, Developmental psychology, Clinical psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Identity Conflict in People with Intellectual Disabilities: What Role do Service-providers Play in Mediating Stigma? — Research Paper | ScholarLens