1984The Tohoku Journal of Experimental MedicineOpen access

Early electrodiagnosis of the ulnar entrapment neuropathy at the elbow.

Itaru Kimura, D. R. Ayyar, Susan Lippmann

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

Reliable, technically not demanding, electrophysiological tests make it possible to diagnose the ulnar entrapment neuropathy at the elbow. Ulnar nerve was stimulated supramaximally at the wrist, below and above the elbow, and in the upper arm, and the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) were recorded. Sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities (SNCVs, MNCVs) were calculated in each segment. In 12 of 64 symptomatic extremities of 44 patients with a presumptive diagnosis of the ulnar neuropathy at the elbow MNCVs of all segments were within normal limit and only SNCV across the elbow was significantly slowed (p less than 0.001). In 25 extremities of the patients SNAP was not obtained. Evidence of denervation in the first dorsal interosseous and abductor digiti minimi muscles was detected in about 50% hands tested. This percentage was higher in the hands with absence of SNAP than those with presence of SNAPs. It would appear that measurement of SNCV across the elbow is a more sensitive parameter to detect abnormal conduction across the cubital tunnel in patients with the ulnar neuropathy.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Reliable, technically not demanding, electrophysiological tests make it possible to diagnose the ulnar entrapment neuropathy at the elbow. Ulnar nerve was stimulated supramaximally at the wrist, below and above the elbow, and in the upper arm, and the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) were recorded. Sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities (SNCVs, MNCVs) were calculated in each segment. In 12 of 64 symptomatic extremities of 44 patients with a presumptive diagnosis of the ulnar neuropathy at the elbow MNCVs of all segments were within normal limit and only SNCV across the elbow was significantly slowed (p less than 0.001). In 25 extremities of the patients SNAP was not obtained. Evidence of denervation in the first dorsal interosseous and abductor digiti minimi muscles was detected in about 50% hands tested. This percentage was higher in the hands with absence of SNAP than those with presence of SNAPs. It would appear that measurement of SNCV across the elbow is a more sensitive parameter to detect abnormal conduction across the cubital tunnel in patients with the ulnar neuropathy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Reliable, technically not demanding, electrophysiological tests make it possible to diagnose the ulnar entrapment neuropathy at the elbow. Ulnar nerve was stimulated supramaximally at the wrist, below and above the elbow, and in the upper arm, and the sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) were recorded. Sensory and motor nerve conduction velocities (SNCVs, MNCVs) were calculated in each segment. In 12 of 64 symptomatic extremities of 44 patients with a presumptive diagnosis of the ulnar neuropathy at the elbow MNCVs of all segments were within normal limit and only SNCV across the elbow was significantly slowed (p less than 0.001). In 25 extremities of the patients SNAP was not obtained. Evidence of denervation in the first dorsal interosseous and abductor digiti minimi muscles was detected in about 50% hands tested. This percentage was higher in the hands with absence of SNAP than those with presence of SNAPs. It would appear that measurement of SNCV across the elbow is a more sensitive parameter to detect abnormal conduction across the cubital tunnel in patients with the ulnar neuropathy.

Key concepts: Ulnar neuropathy, Elbow, Ulnar nerve, Medicine, Entrapment Neuropathy, Cubital tunnel, Compound muscle action potential, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Early electrodiagnosis of the ulnar entrapment neuropathy at the elbow. — Research Paper | ScholarLens