2004Journal of Cosmetic DermatologyRequires access

Botulinum toxin for periocular lines: the single‐injection technique

Giovanni Salti

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Botulinum is a well established treatment for facial wrinkles and hyperfunctional lines, including those at the periocular area. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate a simple periocular injection technique. It differs from the usual one since it is a single injection, instead of several. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients were treated with this technique on one side, and the standard multipuncture technique on the contralateral side. Each patient, being their own control, received 10-12 Botox units to each side. The orbicularis oculi muscle was injected using two different types of needles: a standard 30 g 13 mm needle for the multipunctured side and a 30 g 25 mm needle for the single puncture side. Follow up assessments were made on days 7, 15 and 120. RESULTS: Good results were achieved in all patients. No relevant cosmetic difference was noticeable between the two sides. The pharmacological effect lasted about 5 months, with no difference between the two techniques. Both techniques were safe and caused the same amount of bruising. The single injection was preferred by patients. The single-injection technique, on the other hand, requires more skill and experience by the operator. CONCLUSIONS: The single-injection technique for periocular lines is a useful alternative to the standard multipuncture technique. It reduces patients' discomfort.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Botulinum is a well established treatment for facial wrinkles and hyperfunctional lines, including those at the periocular area. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate a simple periocular injection technique. It differs from the usual one since it is a single injection, instead of several. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients were treated with this technique on one side, and the standard multipuncture technique on the contralateral side. Each patient, being their own control, received 10-12 Botox units to each side. The orbicularis oculi muscle was injected using two different types of needles: a standard 30 g 13 mm needle for the multipunctured side and a 30 g 25 mm needle for the single puncture side. Follow up assessments were made on days 7, 15 and 120. RESULTS: Good results were achieved in all patients. No relevant cosmetic difference was noticeable between the two sides. The pharmacological effect lasted about 5 months, with no difference between the two techniques. Both techniques were safe and caused the same amount of bruising. The single injection was preferred by patients. The single-injection technique, on the other hand, requires more skill and experience by the operator. CONCLUSIONS: The single-injection technique for periocular lines is a useful alternative to the standard multipuncture technique. It reduces patients' discomfort.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Botulinum is a well established treatment for facial wrinkles and hyperfunctional lines, including those at the periocular area. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate a simple periocular injection technique. It differs from the usual one since it is a single injection, instead of several. METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients were treated with this technique on one side, and the standard multipuncture technique on the contralateral side. Each patient, being their own control, received 10-12 Botox units to each side. The orbicularis oculi muscle was injected using two different types of needles: a standard 30 g 13 mm needle for the multipunctured side and a 30 g 25 mm needle for the single puncture side. Follow up assessments were made on days 7, 15 and 120. RESULTS: Good results were achieved in all patients. No relevant cosmetic difference was noticeable between the two sides. The pharmacological effect lasted about 5 months, with no difference between the two techniques. Both techniques were safe and caused the same amount of bruising. The single injection was preferred by patients. The single-injection technique, on the other hand, requires more skill and experience by the operator. CONCLUSIONS: The single-injection technique for periocular lines is a useful alternative to the standard multipuncture technique. It reduces patients' discomfort.

Key concepts: Botulinum toxin, Toxin, Medicine, Biology, Microbiology, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Botulinum toxin for periocular lines: the single‐injection technique — Research Paper | ScholarLens