1996•Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économiqueRequires access

Equilibrium Theory and Economic Fluctuations

Christof Rühl

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The popularity of business cycle theories, it is often said, appears to be subject to cyclical fluctuations itself. This paper addresses two of the theoretical problems which might provide reasons for such an observation. The first concerns the reconciliation of business cycle and general equilibrium theory, while the second considers, more generally, the link between short run economic fluctuations and the long run theory of growth. Both topics are addressed by comparing recent theoretical developments with the debate in the interwar period, with an emphasis on Hayek's contribution to business cycle theory. It is argued here that a re-interpretation of Hayek's theory as an attempt to model short run fluctuations where rationality is bounded provides an alternative starting point for modeling path dependent behaviour which is overlooked when Hayek's work is considered a precursor of equilibrium business cycle theory, failing simply for a lack of formal sophistication.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The popularity of business cycle theories, it is often said, appears to be subject to cyclical fluctuations itself. This paper addresses two of the theoretical problems which might provide reasons for such an observation. The first concerns the reconciliation of business cycle and general equilibrium theory, while the second considers, more generally, the link between short run economic fluctuations and the long run theory of growth. Both topics are addressed by comparing recent theoretical developments with the debate in the interwar period, with an emphasis on Hayek's contribution to business cycle theory. It is argued here that a re-interpretation of Hayek's theory as an attempt to model short run fluctuations where rationality is bounded provides an alternative starting point for modeling path dependent behaviour which is overlooked when Hayek's work is considered a precursor of equilibrium business cycle theory, failing simply for a lack of formal sophistication.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The popularity of business cycle theories, it is often said, appears to be subject to cyclical fluctuations itself. This paper addresses two of the theoretical problems which might provide reasons for such an observation. The first concerns the reconciliation of business cycle and general equilibrium theory, while the second considers, more generally, the link between short run economic fluctuations and the long run theory of growth. Both topics are addressed by comparing recent theoretical developments with the debate in the interwar period, with an emphasis on Hayek's contribution to business cycle theory. It is argued here that a re-interpretation of Hayek's theory as an attempt to model short run fluctuations where rationality is bounded provides an alternative starting point for modeling path dependent behaviour which is overlooked when Hayek's work is considered a precursor of equilibrium business cycle theory, failing simply for a lack of formal sophistication.

Key concepts: Economics, Mathematical economics, Statistical physics, Keynesian economics, Neoclassical economics, Econometrics, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Equilibrium Theory and Economic Fluctuations — Research Paper | ScholarLens